Skip to comments.
SUPREME COURT ISSUES STAY IN SAN DIEGO CROSS CASE - High court intervenes in fight over cross
AP ^
| 7/3/06
| TONI LOCY
Posted on 07/03/2006 11:36:51 AM PDT by Pukin Dog
Edited on 07/03/2006 12:00:01 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-210 next last
1
posted on
07/03/2006 11:36:53 AM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
To: Pukin Dog
2
posted on
07/03/2006 11:37:57 AM PDT
by
bobbyd
(Damn, I've been tagged.....)
To: Pukin Dog
Allright!! Here's hoping some common sense breaks out!
3
posted on
07/03/2006 11:38:14 AM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: Pukin Dog
I've just about lost all faith in the SCOTUS.
If they get one right it's most likely an accident.
L
4
posted on
07/03/2006 11:38:18 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
To: Pukin Dog
5
posted on
07/03/2006 11:38:19 AM PDT
by
vrwc1
To: Pukin Dog
I might have gotten a bit excited?
It is actually San Diego vs. Dirty Atheists.
Sorry.
6
posted on
07/03/2006 11:38:47 AM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Dont be a Conservopussy! Defend Ann Coulter, you weenies!)
To: Pukin Dog
Alright. That's what I'm talkin' about
7
posted on
07/03/2006 11:38:58 AM PDT
by
mware
(Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
To: Pukin Dog
High court intervenes in fight over cross
TONI LOCY
Associated Press
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court intervened Monday to save a large cross on city property in southern California.
A lower court judge had ordered the city of San Diego to remove the cross or be fined $5,000 a day.
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, acting for the high court, issued a stay while supporters of the cross continue their legal fight.
Lawyers for San Diegans for the Mt. Soledad National War Memorial said in an appeal that they wanted to avoid the "destruction of this national treasure." And attorneys for the city said the cross was part of a broader memorial that was important to the community.
The 29-foot cross, on San Diego property, sits atop Mount Soledad. A judge declared it was an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.
The cross, which has been in place for decades, was contested by Philip Paulson, a Vietnam veteran and atheist.
Three years ago the Supreme Court refused to consider to consider the long-running dispute between Paulson and the city.
8
posted on
07/03/2006 11:39:13 AM PDT
by
RobFromGa
To: Pukin Dog; SoCalPol
9
posted on
07/03/2006 11:39:24 AM PDT
by
b9
("the [evil Marxist liberal socialist Democrat Party] alternative is unthinkable" ~ Jim Robinson)
To: onyx; doodlelady
10
posted on
07/03/2006 11:39:32 AM PDT
by
Hildy
(Change calls the tune we dance to.)
To: Pukin Dog
Excellent news. Way to be on top of it, Dog. If it ain't posted on Free Republic, it ain't news...
11
posted on
07/03/2006 11:40:13 AM PDT
by
abb
(Because News Reporting is too Important to be Entrusted to Journalists)
To: Pukin Dog
Definitely good news for this Fourth of July.
12
posted on
07/03/2006 11:40:25 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
To: RobFromGa
Please provide a source and working link for the article.
Thanks.
To: Pukin Dog
Good news is good news..AND you got the "Dirty Atheists" part right. ;-)
14
posted on
07/03/2006 11:40:45 AM PDT
by
verity
(The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
To: Pukin Dog
For those that have not seen this war memorial, it is one of the most beautiful spots in the entire world. I applaud Kennedy, of all people
15
posted on
07/03/2006 11:40:54 AM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: Pukin Dog
Glorious News !!!!!
16
posted on
07/03/2006 11:41:00 AM PDT
by
afnamvet
(It is what it is.)
To: RobFromGa; Admin Moderator
Hey mods, would you please replace my outburst with post #8's information? Thanks, PD.
17
posted on
07/03/2006 11:41:13 AM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Dont be a Conservopussy! Defend Ann Coulter, you weenies!)
To: RobFromGa
Three years ago the Supreme Court refused to consider to consider the long-running dispute between Paulson and the city.
Three years ago, the Court was different.
18
posted on
07/03/2006 11:41:16 AM PDT
by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: Pukin Dog
ok, this is just a stay until they decide, nothing more. They do this kind of stuff all the time and it means nothing.
19
posted on
07/03/2006 11:41:16 AM PDT
by
Halls
(One Proud Texas Momma!!)
To: Halls
It is still awesome news down here in SD. The Supremes have never been kind to dirty atheists either, so there is hope.
20
posted on
07/03/2006 11:42:25 AM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Dont be a Conservopussy! Defend Ann Coulter, you weenies!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-210 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson