Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Defender2
Yep, the Montana class would have been the ultimate battleships but alas they were never built.

As an interesting note, during the days of battleship building, Montana was the only state never to have an active duty battleship named for it.

82 posted on 07/03/2006 10:44:03 AM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: COEXERJ145
Interestingly, Montana got screwed twice. The firest Montana (BB-51) was laid down in 1920, but was cancelled in 1922 by the Washington Treaty.

BB-67 never actually had her keel laid.

83 posted on 07/03/2006 10:49:49 AM PDT by Doohickey (Democrats are nothing without a constituency of victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: COEXERJ145
By the time the Montana class was canceled, the aircraft carrier had already supplanted battleships as the dominant force in naval combat. Midway took care of that when Yamamoto was forced to retreat before his battlewagons could have any affect on the battle.
91 posted on 07/03/2006 10:56:58 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("By the time I'm finished with you, you're gonna wish you felt this good again" - Jack Bauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: COEXERJ145
Actually, a USS Montana was begun but canceled due to arms limitations in 1922:

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-m/bb51.htm

Here's an artist conception of what the WWII Montana class would have looked like.


92 posted on 07/03/2006 10:59:12 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson