To: Gator101
yea the costs were pretty high. but we know what a bad guy in a small raft with a big bomb can do to modern ships too. the bomb that tore a gaping hole in the side of the gmd USS Cole would have left a flash mark on the side of the New Jersey. surface skimming antiship missiles would not penetrate the armor plate either (so i have been told).
100 posted on
07/03/2006 11:09:27 AM PDT by
APRPEH
(You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.)
To: APRPEH
That's true.
I once heard a story that after a kamikaze hit on a US battleship the next command that came over the loudspeaker was "Sailors, man your brooms!"
(...of course I have heard the same story to describe a hit on a British carrier which had an armored flight deck)
To: APRPEH
From WWII on, even ONE hit on a DD (or FF) sized ship has taken out that ship: After just one hit, EVERY destroyer (which are now cruiser-sized: CG-47 etc are on essentially Spruance hulls) has lost power, command & control, fire control, or propulsion.
Several that have been hit (even if the shell or missile doesn't explode) have sunk from secondary fires. Those that hit a mine or water-level blast have been lost for years of repair.
But EVERY one has lost the ability to keep fighting after only one hit. The list includes some 40-odd destroyers: only a few such as Sheffield, Stark, Cole are well known.
We had two DDG's off of Vietnam that got hit shrapnel from near-misses that lost their radar for example. No radar = no fight back.
157 posted on
07/03/2006 1:08:07 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson