Skip to comments.
Anti-Bush Pentagon officials leak military secrets to Iran
FrontPageMag.com ^
| July 2, 2006
| David Horowitz
Posted on 07/02/2006 6:04:33 PM PDT by Eagle9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
To: jackv
LOL, yes but ironically it was his country that went down first in the same manner. I think we have time, but we need to screw the courage to the heart and take these leakers/treasonous bas$tards on in full public view. Bring it on!
61
posted on
07/02/2006 10:10:15 PM PDT
by
church16
(“People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence...")
To: Eagle9
62
posted on
07/02/2006 10:22:35 PM PDT
by
Christian4Bush
(The Rat Party's goal is to END the conflict, not WIN the conflict...should be the other way around.)
To: Eagle9
63
posted on
07/03/2006 1:34:46 AM PDT
by
SR 50
(Larry)
To: Cementjungle
Yes - we are engaged in a three-way religious war:
- Judeo-Christian
- Islamo-Fascist
- Secular-Atheist
As is usually the case in a three-way conflict, the two weaker sides tend to gang up on the strongest side.
64
posted on
07/03/2006 4:20:45 AM PDT
by
ThePythonicCow
(We are but Seekers of Truth, not the Source.)
To: Eagle9
65
posted on
07/03/2006 7:04:41 AM PDT
by
expatguy
(http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
To: Arrowhead1952
liberals think the rosenbergs selling bomb secrets to the USSr was a good thing.
We need to imprison many of these leakers to set a proper example to the others.
66
posted on
07/03/2006 9:33:08 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory
We need to imprison many of these leakers to set a proper example to the others.I agree with you 100%, but the ACLU will still insist they were "denied their freedom of speech".
67
posted on
07/03/2006 11:26:41 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(The media and the democrats are the biggest supporters of the terrorists.)
To: Eagle9
Is this the Seymour Hersh article he's referring to?
68
posted on
07/03/2006 3:37:25 PM PDT
by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: nuconvert
Is this the Seymour Hersh article he's referring to? The Reuters article, which Horowitz links to in the second sentence, refers to a New Yorker article by Seymour Hersh on Sunday July 2.
The New Yorker
LAST STAND
The military’s problem with the President’s Iran policy
By Seymour M Hersh
2006-07-03
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060710fa_fact
That 7-3-06 Hersh article recycles a lot from his 4-8-06 New Yorker article.
Would President Bush go to war to stop Tehran from getting the bomb?
http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/060417fa_fact
Both of these articles apparently recycled a lot from an earlier article, The Coming Wars
The Pentagon responded, "Statement from Pentagon Spokesman Lawrence DiRita on Latest Seymour Hersh Article", on January 17, 2005. See post 38.
Horowitz refers to Frank Rich in the fourth paragraph. Since I don't subscribe to the online NYT, I haven't read that editorial.
69
posted on
07/03/2006 8:20:39 PM PDT
by
Eagle9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson