Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon sees Iran bombing as unsuccessful: report
Reuters ^

Posted on 07/02/2006 11:49:05 AM PDT by markedmannerf

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Top Pentagon officers have told the Bush administration that bombing Iranian nuclear facilities would probably fail to destroy that country's nuclear program, the New Yorker magazine reported on Sunday. ADVERTISEMENT

The senior commanders also warned that any attack launched if diplomacy fails to end the standoff over Iran's nuclear ambitions could have "serious economic, political, and military consequences for the United States," the article said, citing unidentified U.S. military officials.

"A crucial issue in the military's dissent, the officers said, is the fact that American and European intelligence agencies have not found specific evidence of clandestine activities or hidden facilities; the war planners are not sure what to hit," according to the report.

The U.S. military's experience in Iraq, where no weapons of mass destruction were found and the war continues, has affected its approach to Iran, the magazine quoted a high-ranking general as saying.

"The target array in Iran is huge, but it's amorphous," the unidentified general was quoted as saying. "We built this big monster with Iraq, and there was nothing there.

"This is son of Iraq."

The United States on Friday spurned Iranian calls for more time to study an offer of incentives to curb its nuclear fuel program, insisting Tehran must reply by the Group of Eight industrialized nations' deadline on July 5.

The article, by journalist Seymour Hersh, also questioned the effectiveness of U.S. targeting potential nuclear sites.

"Intelligence has also shown that for the past two years the Iranians have been shifting their most sensitive nuclear-related materials and production facilities, moving some into urban areas, in anticipation of a bombing raid," it said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hersh; iran; proliferation; seymourhersh; unidentifiedsources; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 07/02/2006 11:49:07 AM PDT by markedmannerf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf
Pentagon sees Iran bombing as unsuccessful: report

My gawd, is there any secret that is sacred in this day and age?

2 posted on 07/02/2006 11:50:26 AM PDT by dirtboy (When Bush is on the same side as Ted the Swimmer on an issue, you know he's up to no good...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

"citing unidentified U.S. military officials" = Pvt Jones on Latrine Detail?


3 posted on 07/02/2006 11:52:19 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (You don't win wars by being nice to the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Well take it with mountains of salt - any officers that would leak to the likes of Seymour "Traitor" Hersch have an agenda. The comments on Iraq sound like "revenge of the Clintonistas"...... there's much more to this than what appears in this biased article.


4 posted on 07/02/2006 11:53:06 AM PDT by Enchante (Keller & Sulzberger: Forget elections, WE are the self-appointed judges of everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf

Article by Seymour Hersh!!! A traitor through and through!!! Not worth commenting on!!!


5 posted on 07/02/2006 11:54:17 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Could be a smokescreen. I doubt the Pentagon doesn't know where to bomb.


6 posted on 07/02/2006 11:54:26 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf
Al Reuters with yet another "you can't attack Iran", agenda "journalism".
Sigh.
Straight to the garbage bin.
7 posted on 07/02/2006 11:55:25 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf; Peach; Phsstpok
Well looks like we got another New York contest in written fiction going here.

Right. If I am a top level Bush appointee the VERY first people I am going to leak to is the New Yorker Magazine. Let me guess another "Seymour Hersch" exclusive scoop? What this the 2 or 3rd supposedly"secret" story on the Middle East they have supposedly "Uncovered". Just another "Flush the Koran" story.

Curious? "Top Pentagon Officials"? The heads of the Maintenance and Lawn keeper Unions maybe?

8 posted on 07/02/2006 11:55:54 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie; Peach; Phsstpok
The article, by journalist Seymour Hersh, also questioned the effectiveness of U.S. targeting potential nuclear sites.

Bing bing bing! Winner! We have a winner. So is this the 2nd or the 3rd New Yorker article claiming this lie by old Sleazy Seymour?

9 posted on 07/02/2006 11:57:28 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I used to take the NEW YORKER; after Sept 11 they basically blamed the US for all the world's problems. Canceled it.

Don't believe ANYTHING they say. NOTHING. They hate middle Americans, Christians, and Republicans. If it were up to them we'd all be in jail.





10 posted on 07/02/2006 11:58:45 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

More of the "Clinton Genaerals". Hmm maybe Wesely Clark is the "source" Notice they do not specific that the "source" is a ACTIVE duty General.


11 posted on 07/02/2006 11:59:37 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf

Are we now justified in believiing some kind of military action is in the offing? This story is such clear disinformation that something must be in the works.


12 posted on 07/02/2006 12:00:57 PM PDT by DC Bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf

This sounds to me like more belly-aching from the usual Clintonista political EX-generals.


13 posted on 07/02/2006 12:00:58 PM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf

Besides learning that there are military officials who are so enamored of a political agenda that they're willing to manipulate public policy through anonymous leaks, I also learned that 500 rounds of WMD weapons found in Iraq are not worth mentioning.

The media is no longer manipulating facts to suit their needs, they're lying, fabricating, and deliberately trying to alter reality through repetition of what they'd like to be true.

It is appalling to the extreme.


14 posted on 07/02/2006 12:00:59 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf

The article, by journalist Seymour Hersh, one of the most disgusting examples of the traitorous America-hating socialist left.....


15 posted on 07/02/2006 12:01:18 PM PDT by motorola7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf
"The target array in Iran is huge, but it's amorphous," the unidentified general was quoted as saying. "We built this big monster with Iraq, and there was nothing there

How come the "unidentified" source is always making DEM/RAT talking points.

16 posted on 07/02/2006 12:04:21 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf
The U.S. military's experience in Iraq, where no weapons of mass destruction were found...

500=0 using al-Reuters math.

17 posted on 07/02/2006 12:06:23 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Could be a smokescreen. I doubt the Pentagon doesn't know where to bomb.

I bet they fed this loser a pile of misinformation so keep Iran guessing. We have a lot of friends in that country. I can't believe we don't also have a large amount of good information, too.

In case any Iranians mullahs are reading this, I am just kidding. We really know nothing at all. Trust me.

18 posted on 07/02/2006 12:07:32 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: motorola7
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seymour_Hersh

Hersh has written a series of articles for The New Yorker magazine detailing military and security matters surrounding the US-led invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq. In a 2004 article, he alleged that Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld circumvented the normal intelligence analysis function of the CIA in their quest to make the case for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Another article, Lunch with the Chairman, led Richard Perle to say that Hersh was the "closest thing American journalism has to a terrorist."
19 posted on 07/02/2006 12:08:35 PM PDT by markedmannerf ("Borders, Language and Culture")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf

Well, I think that the US cannot rule out using weapons that are armed with 5-kt (or less) warheads.


20 posted on 07/02/2006 12:08:58 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson