Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Copycatty Coulter Pilfers Prose: Pro
NY Post ^ | July 2, 2006 | PHILIP RECCHIA

Posted on 07/02/2006 5:26:36 AM PDT by publius1

Conservative scribe Ann Coulter cribbed liberally in her latest book, "Godless," according to a plagiarism expert.

John Barrie, the creator of a leading plagiarism-recognition system, claimed he found at least three instances of what he calls "textbook plagiarism" in the leggy blond pundit's "Godless: the Church of Liberalism" after he ran the book's text through the company's digital iThenticate program.

He also says he discovered verbatim lifts in Coulter's weekly column, which is syndicated to more than 100 newspapers, including the Fort Lauderdale (Fla.) Sun-Sentinel and Augusta (Ga.) Chronicle.

Barrie, CEO of iParadigms, told The Post that one 25-word passage from the "Godless" chapter titled "The Holiest Sacrament: Abortion" appears to have been lifted nearly word for word from Planned Parenthood literature published at least 18 months before Coulter's 281-page book was released.

A separate, 24-word string from the chapter "The Creation Myth" appeared about a year earlier in the San Francisco Chronicle with just one word change-"stacked" was changed to "piled."

Another 33-word passage that appears five pages into "Godless" allegedly comes from a 1999 article in the Portland (Maine) Press Herald.

Coulter did not respond to requests for comment.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: annisgreat; billaryhatesann; bookreview; coulter; godless; hillaryhatesann; plagerismexpert; plagiarism; thelefthatesann; untruthful
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-142 next last
To: Non-Sequitur

The company that did the analysis (iParadigms) is run by a Moveon.org operative. Please do your research on the background of the people mounting the attack before you attack Miss Coulter.


61 posted on 07/02/2006 6:47:12 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: publius1

It would seem to be a good idea for all authors and publishers to run their stuff through plagiarism detection software.

Even high school teachers have access to this stuff. You have the kid submit his paper directly to the company online. They then email an assessment to the teacher telling the percent of suspcious text and marking those sections. Every paper submitted by a kid becomes a new part of the data base, so if you hand off a paper to a sibling or friend, they will be busted. There are also services online that allow kids to buy papers on any topic. But using plagiarism software would limit the number of times a paper could be sold.

I remember once in college taking verbatim notes on an index card (ah, the good old days before computerized cut and paste) and then paraphrasing it in my paper. When I did a final reading of it (done on a typewriter, of course), I again reworded what I wrote. I managed to duplicate some of the original text since it sounded better.

While looking for something else in the index cards, I found that very familiar chunk of text. Would that be plagiarism? The prof probably wouldn't have caught it, but such things can happen. And these days, it is so easy to grab text that sometimes you forget to note where it came from.

That's why everyone should check their stuff since the software is available.


62 posted on 07/02/2006 6:48:10 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
How can one plagarize their own work?

There has actually been a judicial decision on this. Rocker John Fogarty (remember Creedence Clearwater Revival?) was accused of copying, in a new song, the style and content of one of his older songs for Creedence. The case came to trial because copyright on the older work was now owned by a different media conglomerate from the one owning the new work.

The jury decided that no such concept of self-plagiarism existed.

Thanks for the info. I always thought self plagerism was a silly notion.

63 posted on 07/02/2006 6:48:39 AM PDT by MaggieCarta (If Coulrophobia is the fear of clowns, is Coulterphobia fear of conservatives? Quote me on this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: CPOSharky
John Barrie, the creator of a leading plagiarism-recognition system...

I wonder what popular liberal books he has run through his software.

64 posted on 07/02/2006 6:51:59 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

More on IParadigms...

http://www.sensiblepriorities.org/ads/nyt_ad_pressrelease.php

Steven
Berger,
Chairman,
IParadigms, LLC
San Francisco
CA

New Ad Calls Katrina Dead "Another Casualty Of The War In Iraq"

BUSINESS LEADERS TO BUSH: "BRING THE TROOPS HOME, REBUILD AMERICA"

A new full page print ad signed by more than 100 CEO's and other business people calls Hurricane Katrina's toll of lost lives and property "another casualty of the war in Iraq." The ad, slated to run in tomorrow's New York Times, calls on the President to stop the loss of lives and resources in Iraq and redirect his efforts towards rebuilding America.

Business Leaders for Sensible Priorities, the ads sponsor, cites federal government failures due to wrong priorities: budget cuts that undermined hurricane protection projects around Lake Pontchartrain; flood prevention projects in New Orleans; the gutting of FEMA; and the absence of one half of Louisiana National Guardsmen who were serving in Iraq.

Signers include Ben Cohen, Co-Founder Ben & Jerry's, Alan E. Kligerman, CEO, Akpharma Inc., and Seth M. Glickenhaus, Senior Partner of Glickenhaus & Co.



Steven
Berger,
Chairman,
IParadigms, LLC
San Francisco
CA


65 posted on 07/02/2006 6:52:01 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: publius1

(Yawn) Just another liberal butt-wipe with a grudge.....


66 posted on 07/02/2006 6:52:58 AM PDT by NRA1995 (Zarqawi died, liberals cried....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Well if Coulter did plagerize that of course means that there are others (probably many others) who agree with what she has to say. ;-)


67 posted on 07/02/2006 6:58:57 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: publius1

In that the article does not provide adequate specifics to backup Barrie's allegations, I'm left to choose between believing in Coulter's integrity or that of a pack of rabid, fuming, irrational liberals led by a guy who's hawking a software product of dubious merit.

Let me think....


68 posted on 07/02/2006 7:00:12 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
The company that did the analysis (iParadigms) is run by a Moveon.org operative. Please do your research on the background of the people mounting the attack before you attack Miss Coulter.

Well heck, I didn't think they were loyal members of the Ann Coulter Fan Club. Regardless of their funding or their motivation, either the charges are true or they aren't. Either way it isn't going to hurt Coulter's sales or damage Coulter's reputation among the faithful. She might get sued but those she copied from if the charges are true, but that's about it.

69 posted on 07/02/2006 7:03:16 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

The NY Post writer philip.recchia@nypost.com should be asked why he's using a San Francisco company that is run by a Moveon.org operative as his only source for this story.

Pretty sad that Moveon.org is setting the agenda for the NY Post these days.


70 posted on 07/02/2006 7:03:29 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
From your posts on this thread, it appears that you have tried and convicted Coulter based on this story. Have you verified it? I'm saying that this is a tempest in a teapot stirred up to discredit Ann.

Well if the stories are lies, as you seem to think they are, then the truth will come out soon enough. Long after this charge has faded away. I give it about a 24 hour lifespan in the media.

71 posted on 07/02/2006 7:04:58 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Why are you so willing to trust a Moveon.org operative? Are you affiliated with them?


72 posted on 07/02/2006 7:05:02 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Why are you so willing to trust a Moveon.org operative? Are you affiliated with them?

Nope. But if they're lying then it's kind of stupid of them since it's such an easy lie to disprove. If their claims are false then the truth will come out.

73 posted on 07/02/2006 7:08:38 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

He's just a renown, sagacious arbiter of all things pertaining to Truth & Fairness.


74 posted on 07/02/2006 7:15:39 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: publius1
A separate, 24-word string from the chapter "The Creation Myth" appeared about a year earlier in the San Francisco Chronicle with just one word change-"stacked" was changed to "piled."

A 24-word "string" is a SENTENCE, in fact a shorter SENTENCE than the above SENTENCE.
75 posted on 07/02/2006 7:18:55 AM PDT by Vinomori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

It's just surprising that someone would would take as gospel the accusations of a Moveon.org operative. Distortion, lies and smears are Moveon.org's stock in trade.


76 posted on 07/02/2006 7:19:34 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: publius1

People with too much time on their hands.


77 posted on 07/02/2006 7:21:55 AM PDT by Jaded (does it really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

"the story gets Coulter and plagarize in the same sentence. Thats probably all they really wanted."

Coulter is being Limbaughed.


78 posted on 07/02/2006 7:23:50 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (Stop the ACLU - Support the Public Expression of Religion Act 2005 - Call your congressmen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Some FReepers use a microscope in examining Conservatives while manifesting their own blindness to the wiles of the Left.


79 posted on 07/02/2006 7:25:31 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: publius1

Next: Ann Coulter's first grade teacher tells all! Hear the sordid details about the time 6-year-old Annie wet her pants after nap time! See the pictures of her swinging on the jungle gym and showing her knickers, while the boys sing "London, London, I See France." Watch as she breaks down in tears and demonstrates her finely honed mean-spiritedness by calling Jimmy Reynolds a "poopy head dumb butt."


80 posted on 07/02/2006 7:36:21 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson