Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Green' Burials Growing in Popularity
Casper Star Tribune ^ | Saturday, July 01, 2006 | WILLIAM KATES

Posted on 07/01/2006 10:03:57 PM PDT by Lorianne

NEWFIELD, N.Y. - It sits on the eastern fringe of New York's Finger Lakes region and is bounded on three sides by 8,000 acres of protected forests: the perfectly natural place to spend an eternity.

The 93-acre Greensprings Natural Cemetery is the first of its kind in New York and one of just a handful in the United States, where interest in "green" burial is just taking root.

Carl Leopold, a retired Cornell University plant scientist, bought one of the first 20 plots sold.

"It's so sensible," he said. "Putting bodies in a waterproof, permanent container protected from the environment, it's ridiculous."

At Greensprings, where a plot costs $500 plus a $350 fee to dig the grave, bodies cannot be embalmed or otherwise chemically preserved. They must be buried in biodegradable caskets without linings or metal ornamentation. The cemetery suggests locally harvested woods, wicker or cloth shrouds. Concrete or steel burial vaults are not allowed. Nor are standing monuments, upright tombstones or statues.

Only flat, natural fieldstones are permitted as grave markers (they can be engraved). Shrubs or trees are preferred.

And only one person is allowed in each 15-foot-by-15-foot plot.

"This is more than just dig a hole in the woods and roll them in. We see it as a natural return to the Earth, becoming part of the circle of life," said Mary Woodsen, a lifelong conservationist and the cemetery's president.

"Not everyone will find this appealing," she said. "But there are people who want that look and feel of nature."

Natural or woodland cemeteries are common in the United Kingdom, where they make up more than 10 percent of burials. In the United States, however, green burial is a relatively new idea, but one that has caught the attention of people who favor blending land conservation with a natural approach to funerals.

Thirty-two-acre Ramsey Creek Preserve, which opened in 1998 in rural Westminster, S.C., is acknowledged as the nation's first green cemetery. Others are in Florida, Texas, California and Washington state.

Elizabeth Stuckman, 47, made arrangements to be buried at Ramsey Creek, which was started by family physician and environmentalist Billy Campbell, who was looking to simplify the increasingly involved funeral process and help conserve land. Stuckman had her brother's ashes spread there after he was killed in a car accident last fall. Her parents have plans to be buried there, too.

"There's life in the land. It's not a dead place like a conventional cemetery. It's intensely alive, and that's what you focus on," Stuckman said.

At her brother's funeral, the children were able to play in a nearby stream, while his friends picnicked and performed bluegrass music.

"I like that the land is wild and always changing with time," she said. "Whether we like it or not, death is about change. To pretend my brother is just sleeping under a mowed and manicured lawn is to deny that death is about change."

Today, there are 70 people interred at Ramsey Creek, said Campbell's wife, Kimberley, who is vice president of Memorial Ecosystems, which runs the cemetery.

"We've seen growth in the hospice movement," she said. "We've seen an upswing of home birthing. People are interested in returning to the simple ways. This is just a dust-to-dust approach to funerals."

Robert Fells, a spokesman for the Virginia-based International Cemetery and Funeral Association, said the green concept is just a repackaging of what the conventional cemetery burial already offers.

Contrary to widespread belief, embalming is not required by law so people can refuse it, Fells said. Buy a no-frills wooden coffin. Plant a bush instead of a gravestone. Those options are currently available at most cemeteries, he said.

According to the Federal Trade Commission, the average funeral in the United States costs about $6,000. Many exceed $10,000. Even cremation typically costs more than $1,000 _ and has its environmental downside: Cremation uses energy and releases dioxin and mercury (up to 6 grams a body) while preventing nutrients in bodies from enriching the land.

Josh Slocum, of the Funeral Consumers Alliance, a Burlington, Vt.-based federation of advocacy groups, said natural cemeteries provide "another choice for consumers, and that's always good."

"Most of what we think of today as the traditional funeral _ embalming, expensive caskets, manicured cemeteries _ are practices started in the 20th century when burying the dead became an industry," he said. "This is really nothing new. It's what the pilgrims and the pioneers did ... Really natural burial is as old as death itself."

The Greensprings preserve, located 75 miles southwest of Syracuse, was once mostly pasture and cropland before it was acquired from a conservation-minded seller.

"Someday, we'd like to see most of the property return to the native woodlands that used to be here," said Woodsen.

Eventually, trails will wind through meadows, woods and burial areas.

On the Net:

Greensprings Natural Cemetery Preserve: http://www.naturalburial.org

Ramsey Creek Preserve: http://ramseycreekpreserve.com

A service of the Associated Press(AP)


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cemetary; environment; graveyard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2006 10:03:59 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Al Gore walked by one day and two guys with shovels chased after him.


2 posted on 07/01/2006 10:07:51 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
I actually agree with this guy. I have no real need for my body to be preserved for an eternity even if it was possible. As the song says "Earth and worm they have a claim".
3 posted on 07/01/2006 10:09:52 PM PDT by Hawk1976 (Borders. Language. Culture. AAA-0. Free Travis Mcgee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

LMAO! There was a thread earlier today about "green burial disasters"

That said, i told my kids I want no chemicals used when I take a dirt nap.

Burn me up, pack me into a fireworks shell and let my dust settle where it may.


4 posted on 07/01/2006 10:10:17 PM PDT by Toby06 (True conservatives vote based on their values, not for parties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Actually, I have no problem with this... I actually like the idea, and it cuts the costs down. The Lord I imagine has no problem with me down there naturally... I want to face the east, not creamated, and the Lord will take care of the rest... The big expensive cement vaults mean nothing to Jesus.. anyway... just the funeral homes...


5 posted on 07/01/2006 10:11:12 PM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" -Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

...good place for a vegetable garden. ;-)


6 posted on 07/01/2006 10:11:20 PM PDT by familyop ("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists." --pre-Roadmap President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I'm no tree hugger, but I really like this idea.

A casket is just a method of delaying the inevitable. I'd rather let my carcass get right back into the overall cycle.

Besides, the idea of being eaten by insects after I'm dead isn't so bad to me.


7 posted on 07/01/2006 10:12:24 PM PDT by Greenpees (Coulda Shoulda Woulda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Taking up lawn space for eternity while dead is not environmentally friendly. Better to be created and scattered. Or eaten by some animal.


8 posted on 07/01/2006 10:12:58 PM PDT by Tax Government (Defeat the evil miscreant donkeys and their rhino lackeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government

Or 'buried at sea'. Lots of hungry things there.


9 posted on 07/01/2006 10:14:33 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

LOL!


10 posted on 07/01/2006 10:16:26 PM PDT by skr (We cannot play innocents abroad in a world that is not innocent.-- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Why dad's eco-funeral went horribly wrong
11 posted on 07/01/2006 10:16:36 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I prefer to continue waking up on the green side of the grass...


12 posted on 07/01/2006 10:17:31 PM PDT by tubebender (Some minds are like concrete, thoroughly mixed up and permanently set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
My Last Wish
13 posted on 07/01/2006 10:20:21 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Hilarious!


14 posted on 07/01/2006 10:22:15 PM PDT by T'wit (It is not possible to "go too far" criticizing liberals. No matter what you say, they're worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Hope it don't flood... those waterproof tubes will float


15 posted on 07/01/2006 10:23:02 PM PDT by GeronL (Bush lost his mojo??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greenpees

Worse ... imbalming! Esquire did an article about this about 20 years ago. Scary beyond belief. Who the heck would want that done to them!


16 posted on 07/01/2006 10:23:16 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377; Slings and Arrows


17 posted on 07/01/2006 10:24:36 PM PDT by bitt (NY Times to New York: Drop Dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
It's fine with me.

Why should I want my bones preserved for decades in a hole in the ground?

18 posted on 07/01/2006 10:29:21 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I'm a gardner, I love the idea of enriching the earth. The ancients used to place a walnut or an acorn in the mouth of their dead so when they were buried, a tree would grow.


19 posted on 07/01/2006 10:30:39 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If the intelligence agencies can't find the leakers how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
And only one person is allowed in each 15-foot-by-15-foot plot.

You could fit about six traditional graves in an area that size. Talk about the eco-terrorists being wasteful!

20 posted on 07/01/2006 10:31:10 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson