Replies

"...we could do worse than having Arnold as our "Face" here in this particular market."

You have GOT to be kidding! How could you miss all the rotten "egg" he's put all over our "Face?"

Yeah... He's given Cauleeforneeuns a real "facial," alright! Sheeeesh!!!

Wait till we have to face all the bondage debt payments and are forced to raise taxes to cover the debt service in the future which will rob revenue from any other worthwhile endeavor!

I cannot believe how short sighted so many people on FR are becoming around this celebrity swooning over Schwartzenegger the shifting slimer. He shifts and a whole buncha silly sichophants around here just shift right to the left, right with him!!!

Sorry, but I can imagine worse, I remember Gray Davis and Jerry Brown, and the recent Democrat candidates are far to the left of them.

Until we can get a conservative in that office, we could do a lot worse than Arnold.

Just viewing the record demonstrates that Arnold is not a "good Republican" and the only agenda he wants to push is one does not resemble the Republican platform, whatsoever. On fiscal issues, he has shown to be anything but conservative, as he campaigned, instead proposing bigger spending and borrowing to create an even bigger California government. Equally distasteful are his judicial appointments, his appointment of leftists to high state positions (many of which may outlast his term in office), the subsidizing of questionable technology with taxpayer/ratepayer funds (embryonic stem cell research, solar roofs, hydrogen highways, etc.).

Gray Davis could have only dreamed about getting the same liberal agenda items implemented that Arnold has; he would have been opposed every step of the way. Instead, Republicans are being asked to support liberalism because someone chose to put an (R) next to it. What's frightening is that some people do exactly that in the name of "party."