Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion; calcowgirl; SierraWasp
This is the most ridiculous statement of the CA elections. They are polar opposites -- even Angelides is running as "anti-Arnold"

Arnold is a liberal, Angelides is a liberal.

Arnold is opposed to reducing state spending, Angelides is opposed to reducing state spending.

Arnold has appointed many Democrat judges, Angelides will appoint many Democrat judges.

Arnold thinks abortion is just dandy, Angelides thinks abortion is just dandy.

Arnold thinks sodomy is just another lifestyle, Angelides thinks sodomy is just another lifestyle

Arnold has a former high-level Democrat party hack as his chief of staff. Angelides will likely appoint a Democrat party hack as his chief of staff.

Arnold subscribes to the environmentalist whacko agenda. Angelides subscribes to the environmentalist whacko agenda.

Arnold has refused to endorse the Republican nominee for US Senate. Angelides will likewise refuse to endorse the Republican nominee for US Senate.

Shall I go on? Or perhaps calcowgirls and SierraWasp would like to take over (It's getting late and I have a busy weekend ahead of me.)

44 posted on 07/01/2006 10:44:42 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: ElkGroveDan
....ok. ......well I won't argue with you ....then I'll vote for Arnold cause he is a better action figure...there, now I feel vindicated....lol....have a great weekend...*wink*.....
45 posted on 07/01/2006 10:50:53 PM PDT by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan

Please state in plain English, ARE YOU SUPPORTING ANGELIDES?

It sure seems like it.

Not to mention, that your trying to create an equivalence between Arnold and Angelides is flat out wrong, as I pointed out many times.

How many Republican judges do you think Angelides will apoint?

Arnold did not raise taxes, Angelides wants to raise taxes.

Arnold vetoed homosexual marriage and drivers licenses for illegals, while Angelides is FOR that and will sign the bills the Dem Legislature will pass again.

Arnold is making CA business friendly, while Angelides would chase away business with regulations and taxes.

Arnold tried to control spending, by his Prop. 76, which the VOTERS defeated. Why aren't you blaming the voters?

You sound like someone who keep insisting that CA has an arctic climate and thinks, that if you repeat it often enough people will believe it, when, in fact, all they have to do is look out their window to see that it's not true.


46 posted on 07/01/2006 10:51:59 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan

Come on. You are on a roll. Illegal aliens? How could you miss that!


48 posted on 07/01/2006 11:01:13 PM PDT by OmahaFields ("What have been its fruits? ... superstition, bigotry and persecution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan
Shall I go on? Or perhaps calcowgirls and SierraWasp would like to take over
(It's getting late and I have a busy weekend ahead of me.)

Hey, you're on a roll! I can only add:

Arnold borrows and raises fees; Angelides will raise taxes instead.
Everyone knows that taking on huge debt and future tax increases is better than raising taxes now
(which Angelides would be hard pressed to get past united Republican legislators).

Better than Bustamante!!!

55 posted on 07/01/2006 11:36:49 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan
>>>>Arnold is a liberal, Angelides is a liberal.

Right. And NO conservative in his or her right mind should ever consider casting a vote for a liberal from any political party. If certain Republican Californians decide they will support and vote for Ahnold Schwarzy, fine. Just don't call yourselves, political conservatives. That is a fallacy.

All Americans should vote. Staying home on election day solves nothing. If the choice is between two liberal candidates, one Republican, one Democrat, the conservative should cast their vote for the best alternative third party candidate available. Principles do matter and conservative principles matter most. The best way to undermine conservatism, is to vote for a liberal. Conservatives should never vote for a candidate that advances liberalism. NEVER!

56 posted on 07/01/2006 11:57:50 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Happy 230th Birthday, America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan
... Shall I go on?

Sure, support your demoncrap friends all you like. We expect it of you.

64 posted on 07/02/2006 8:21:57 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson