In other words, you would like to be able to post unsubstantiated comments and have them go unchallenged?
If I read your response correctly you still didn't mention anything about who to vote for, or to not vote at all,
That is correct--because I don't know. I see only bad choices.
you said your point is to continually bitch and point out the negatives of the Republican candidate.
No. I said that politicians should be held accountable and called out when they stray from their promises or work agains the party they supposedly represent. Do you disagree with that?
On some threads that should be the very thing to do, but you can imagine how annoying it is to the rest of us that are trying to analyze the race.
I appreciate analysis. I'll be waiting to see some thoughtful posts, along with supporting rationale and data. I didn't see that on this thread.
You must realize at this stage, most of us know who we are going to vote for, now we are shifting into election mode where our focus is on defeating the opposition candidate.
Then perhaps the cheerleading would be more effective over at DU. Last I checked this was still a conservative forum for discussion about advancing conservatism (as opposed to a Republican Party campaign forum).
Try to differentiate between a thread about the Governors work and a thread about the campaign.
I probably wouldn't have said a word on this thread had I not been pinged to it and read the questionable comments about the work record.
Well, I gave it a shot, what I have learned is that this thread is a place for you to expend some type of emotional energy, that serves no usefulness to the rest of us, that I can see, but you did manage to make yourself the subject of the thread here at the end, so hopefully it gives the little shot you were looking for.
Vote, don't vote, I don't care, your decision on that activity has about as much interest to me, as it seems to have for you.