To: finnsheep
I propose that an amendment to restrict the silly application of interstate commerce rules to intrastate commerce would be a much better use of time for the Congress than a "Marriage" amendment.
7 posted on
07/01/2006 7:38:43 AM PDT by
donmeaker
(If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
To: donmeaker
I propose that an amendment to restrict the silly application of interstate commerce rules to intrastate commerce would be a much better use of time for the Congress than a "Marriage" amendment.That's going to put the jobs of a lot of beltway bureaucrats at risk, and they have better access to your representatives than you do.
8 posted on
07/01/2006 7:40:28 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: donmeaker
Never happen, abuse of the ICC is Gov. Org's. sledge hammer, it can be abused to knock down any restriction of their power they see fit!
The constitutional restrictions on Gov. power are shattered via the ICC.
104 posted on
07/02/2006 2:07:59 PM PDT by
Richard-SIA
("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
To: donmeaker
I propose that an amendment to restrict the silly application of interstate commerce rules to intrastate commerce would be a much better use of time for the Congress than a "Marriage" amendment. Now why would you assume a silly thing like Congress is interested in using its time wisely?
264 posted on
07/05/2006 1:30:32 PM PDT by
Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
(FReeple: Those Freepers who insist on repeating GOP talking points rather than thinking.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson