"and that law stands today in section 922 (q)."Until it's challenged. Like any other law. And there are those who say the law, even with the new language, will not survive if challenged.
922 (q) has been law of the land for ten years now. There are those (Justices O'Connor, Rhenquist, and Thomas) who say that the law with the new language is perfectly Constitutional in light of Raich.
Besides, aren't
you the one who denigrates fans of the judicial oligarchy who go around saying laws are unconstitutional and should be overturned?
Those who want and expect five activist justices on the U.S. Supreme Court to do their work for them are acting like helpless juveniles. Get out the vote and throw out the lawmakers that are writing this overreaching legislation. Now, that may be a little more work than sitting at a keyboard typing "But that's unconstitutional" every time a new law is passed, but that is the way to solve the problem.