Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zon
The only part I paraphrased from Miln is in red:

"In other words, the second amendment only protects the citizen from federal infringement. It then says that if you want protection from your fellow citizens of your right to "bear(ing) arms for a lawful purposes", you need to refer to local law."

I've wasted enough time on this irrelevant garbage. I'm done.

207 posted on 07/03/2006 5:39:41 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Run away so that you can ignore that you quoted City of New York v. Miln in your 153 post in support of your argument. Despite knowing that City of New York v. Miln was later reversed in Edwards v. California in 1941.
208 posted on 07/03/2006 5:48:41 PM PDT by Zon (Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson