Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
That was the original use, yes. Are you saying that's the only way the Commerce Clause may be used -- as a limit on the states from creating barriers to entry?

Isn't that what the power was granted for, and understood to be for that purpose by the States at the time of ratification?

127 posted on 07/03/2006 9:24:59 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
"Isn't that what the power was granted for, and understood to be for that purpose by the States at the time of ratification?"

In my opinion, no. If the Commerce Clause was ONLY to be used that way among the states, it would have been written differently. But the states were lumped in with foreign nations and the Indian tribes, and Jefferson prohibited trade with those two groups.

I have no idea what the states understood. No one told Jefferson that the Commerce Clause didn't allow him to prohibit commerce -- not even his Secretary of State, James Madison, who wrote the damn thing.

136 posted on 07/03/2006 12:00:20 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson