Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB
"the effect on interstate commerce doesn't have to be that much."

I disagree. The court set a standard of "substantial effect" not "somewhat effect".

122 posted on 07/03/2006 8:41:03 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Me: "the effect on interstate commerce doesn't have to be that much."

robertpaulsen: I disagree. The court set a standard of "substantial effect" not "somewhat effect".

But they picked a case with only 12 acres at stake. There is no way those 12 acres had a substantial effect. I think i agree with the quote from justice Thomas - this is a blank check

Its a way to take away individual rights based on the premise that if millions of people did the same thing then together they would effect interstate commerce.

I can see extend in that to home schooling - if millions of families did that then less textbooks from some companies would be purchased by schools. I can think of many possible similar results.
131 posted on 07/03/2006 10:28:14 AM PDT by gondramB (Unity of freedom has never relied upon uniformity of opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson