Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. aircraft carrier to enter Hokkaido port with MSDF destroyer(Kitty Hawk at Otaru)
Kyodo News ^ | 06/30/06

Posted on 07/01/2006 1:48:00 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

U.S. aircraft carrier to enter Hokkaido port with MSDF destroyer

(Kyodo) _ The U.S. aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk, based in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, is to enter a Hokkaido port on Saturday accompanied by a Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force destroyer, MSDF officials said Friday.

The 3,500-ton Yugiri will "strengthen friendship and goodwill" between the MSDF and the U.S. Navy by accompanying Kitty Hawk, and it will not be guarding the U.S. vessel, MSDF officials said, brushing off criticism by civic groups that the MSDF and the U.S. Navy are promoting their integration.

The groups have said integration would amount to exercising the right of collective self-defense, which is banned under the pacifist Constitution.

Yugiri, which belongs to the MSDF Ominato base in Aomori Prefecture, has left Ominato port and is to enter Otaru port in Hokkaido with Kitty Hawk after the two vessels conduct a joint exercise, according to MSDF officials.

A U.S. Navy ship equipped with the Aegis system will also enter Otaru port along with the MSDF destroyer and Kitty Hawk, they said.

Yugiri is expected to leave Otaru next Wednesday along with the two U.S. ships but the officials refused to disclose detailed schedules or information about the exercise. ADVERTISEMENT

According to officials familiar with military affairs, an aircraft carrier is exposed to "the highest risk when it enters or leaves a port" because it cannot move quickly and its aircraft cannot be used.

Shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the United States, about 10 MSDF vessels accompanied Kitty Hawk when it left Yokosuka port for the stated purpose of "investigation and research," according to the MSDF officials.

The move was criticized at that time as a de facto exercising of the right of collective self-defense.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carrier; kittyhawk; missilecrisis; nkorea; northkorea; otaru
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Well, what is Kitty Hawk's next destination? Niigata? Going up and down Japanese E. Coast until Chia Head dismantle whatever is on the launch pad now?
1 posted on 07/01/2006 1:48:03 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/01/2006 1:48:27 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Ready on the right?

Ready on the left?

All ready on the firing line!



3 posted on 07/01/2006 3:05:10 AM PDT by G.Mason (And what is intelligence if not the craft of outthinking our adversaries?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Re #1

Going up and down Japanese E. N.W. Coast

4 posted on 07/01/2006 3:10:23 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
What a bit of ignorant fluff.... it will not be guarding the U.S. vessel

If I am wrong I hope that someone more expert (not that I know that much) will correct me, but I would expect the Japanese Destroyer to be in a position to guard the most valuable ship in the battlegroup, from external atttacks.
5 posted on 07/01/2006 3:35:11 AM PDT by Fraxinus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

It is good that Japanese ships happen to be traveling to the same places as our aircraft carriers. If the enemy launches against one of our carriers, the Japanese vessels can then separately return fire against the enemy in order to defend themselves. ...see? ...no "collective" defense happening there. ;-)


6 posted on 07/01/2006 3:43:40 AM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I rememer one of your Carrier Group Commanders saying "When we turn up in your garden pond it tends to get your attention".....outstanding!


7 posted on 07/01/2006 4:09:11 AM PDT by Brit1 ( Not by Strength by Guile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Hmmmm...


8 posted on 07/01/2006 5:03:30 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Ready on the: north, south, east & west? Turn it loose boys! Good thing Japan understands the importance of working together. Say what you want about them but they know what is in their best interest and who their friends are.
9 posted on 07/01/2006 5:14:44 AM PDT by DogBarkTree (Thanks for putting our boys in harms way, Rep. Murtha, you treasonous jack@ss!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

We interrupt this thread for an important announcement:

Chaps my hide that the Kitty Hawk is still on active duty, and my Ranger is sitting in moth-balls. The Kitty hawk is a good ship; the Ranger was better though, and proved it time and again.

Now back to your regularly scheduled thread.
10 posted on 07/01/2006 5:45:47 AM PDT by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

According to officials familiar with military affairs, an aircraft carrier is exposed to "the highest risk when it enters or leaves a port" because it cannot move quickly and its aircraft cannot be used.

Why can't a carrier's planes be used in port?


11 posted on 07/01/2006 6:10:21 AM PDT by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kent1957
Why can't a carrier's planes be used in port?

Simple. An aircraft carrier must turn into the wind at high-speed to get sufficient wind over the flight deck to launch & recover aircraft. If you can get say 30 knots across the deck, that's 30 knots extra speed as 'seen' by the aircrafts wings. More lift. Even with steam catapults this is still necessary.

Typically the carriers air wing component flys off to a naval air station prior to the carrier entering port. The only aircraft useable in port would be helicopters.

12 posted on 07/01/2006 7:14:16 AM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Yup...I remember launching our helo while tied to the pier at least a couple of times...and that was from a destroyer (an FF actually).


13 posted on 07/01/2006 7:28:27 AM PDT by shorty_harris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Otaru? That's a nice place to visit, though it has been a few years since I was there.

Otaru is famous for its glassware.

Seafood is great in Otaru (as it is generally throughout Hokkaido):

You can also buy fresh crabs (in season only, I imagine) to be shipped anywhere in Japan.

But my guess is that it is Otaru's proximity to the site of North Korea's missile-perhaps-to-be-launched that is bringing the Kitty Hawk north, not the delights of July in Hokkaido.

14 posted on 07/01/2006 7:53:37 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The Kitty Hawk still around? She was old when I was in 30 years ago...


15 posted on 07/01/2006 7:56:58 AM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

You're right. When the carriers come into port the planes have already left - for reasons you describe and because it lightens the load.

BTW the commander of the Pacific Command right now is Navy. He has been making public statements making nice to the Chinese. The statements were drafted, I assume, at the White House.


16 posted on 07/01/2006 7:57:47 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Thanks! I understand the Kitty Hawk is still around because the people of Japan still have an issue with atomic powered vessels. I feel they are changing their minds rather quickly!


17 posted on 07/01/2006 8:11:17 AM PDT by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kent1957

She's an oil burner and I guess the only reason she's still sailing in the nuclear power issue.


18 posted on 07/01/2006 9:23:21 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kent1957
Thanks! I understand the Kitty Hawk is still around because the people of Japan still have an issue with atomic powered vessels.

She's pretty worn-out. The Japanese Government still wants to homeport a US Carrier, so they know they are getting a nuke with the retirement of the Kitty Hawk.

19 posted on 07/01/2006 9:42:45 AM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kent1957
When N. Korea starts lobbing missiles down to Japan we will have to say: "Gee we would like to help you but, you see, we only have Nuke carriers and subs. Good luck!"
20 posted on 07/01/2006 9:56:18 AM PDT by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson