[highlander_UW]

I agree, carrying to term and then adopting out was the best option for her. Suggesting that it doesn't matter if the adopting "parents" are homosexuals means she does not care what happens to the child. A quick review of statistics show that homosexuals abuse children at a MUCH greater rate than heterosexuals. Additionally, practicing homosexuals have a very much shorter lifespan than heterosexuals. There are also higher instances of disease amongst homosexuals...all of these, of course, are not much addressed in the MSM so ignorant people such as this woman have no clue what they are claiming.

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

I agree with you up to a point. I was trying to say that parents should be able to check a box on the adoption papers that says "no homos". That way, it's not an issue of the "rights" of the 'mos vs. the adoption agency. It becomes a matter of the rights of the birth parents vs. the 'mos; with the agency being just that -- an agency.

However, pro-aborts often say that a foetus is better off being aborted, than being born unwanted. It's dangerous to suggest anything remotely similar.