Posted on 06/30/2006 6:57:31 PM PDT by lancer
I see things haven't changed much at the Times.
Thanks for that link, upchuck. They'll pay for this.
Unfortunately, I believe you are right. I don't have much confidence. I sure get frustrated with "our side" because they do not seem to have the stomach to fight these dirt bags. I wish it was different, but I think you are right.
You're welcome. And I certainly hope they do. In spades.
This treason stuff, just like the Criminal Aliens problem, has been allowed to get waaaaay outta control. And the longer it goes on, the harder it becomes to rein it in. We need to get started yesterday.
Sharing classified material does not fall under the First Amendment.
You've been smacked around enough. Hopefully you got your answer.
Great. So I'll go back to an earlier post and present the only two possible scenarios here:
A. The GOP leaders who have claimed that the New York Times has broken the law are totally full of sh!t.
B. The Bush administration knows damn well that the Times has broken the law but has simply refused to uphold the law.
Which do you think is the case here?
"The settlement of international transactions is usually handled through correspondent banking relationships or large-value message and payment systems, such as the SWIFT, Fedwire or CHIPS systems in the United States of America. Such international clearance centres are critical to processing international banking transactions and are rich with payment information. The United States has begun to apply new monitoring techniques to spot and verify suspicious transactions. The Group recommends the adoption of similar mechanisms by other countries." (Report to United Nations Security Council, 2002)
OK -- so let's try this again . . . How can the fact that the U.S. has been using the SWIFT database be considered "classified" when it has been in the public domain since 2002?
See #49.
I didn't say that the Prez would destroy the First Amendment; I said he would be remembered as the President who "tried"....
Believe me the Dems and the libs would try to paint him in such as way to convince the ignorant and uninformed American electorate (which is the majority) that that was what he was trying to do.
See Post #51.
Will do. I'm sending it to the folks in my e-mail address book right now.
no dems
Thanks. It has been bid up to $47 already; that money goes to FR.
OK , how can we find Kellers home address and phone number?
I say hang the SOB ..The Times is a leftist propaganda rag and has been for years. Not even close to being an objective newspaper.
Can a skunk change its stripe? Nope.
He's not even going to 'try'. Hopefully he'll be remembered as the President who stopped vile members of the press from committing treason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.