So, according to you, you and Ann support the idea that viruses came to earth from comet to help jump-start the evolution of life on earth.
You've committed a logical fallacy by suggesting that Ann and I back Hoyle's alternative theory of human origins. Ann cited Hoyle merely to show that some weighty scientists believe there HAS to be an alternative cause, other than evolution - because they see the holes in the evolution theory. Ann didn't endorse the alternative that Hoyle suggested - - she just said that Hoyle's skepticism about evolution shows that evolution is not a proven scientific fact and has some big weaknesses. Wow, your dishonesty in saying that Ann buys Hoyle's alternative - or you weakness with logic -- makes it easier to understand your uncritical support for evolutionary theory; you're not a rigorous thinker.