Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Migraine

It would avoid a lot of hassle if they'd simply amend the law concerning felons and not the laws about firearms. I think many states simply prohibit felons from possessing deadly weapons. Period. That would do it. Next case.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Simple solutions are easy for those who fail to think! You have just advocated banning dang near everything! Do you have any idea how deadly a simple claw hammer is in the hands of an experienced carpenter? Let's not even talk about chainsaws!


34 posted on 06/29/2006 11:52:11 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Does anybody still believe this is a free country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: RipSawyer
You have just advocated banning dang near everything!

States that forbid felons from having deadly weapons enumerate them, and they don't include hammers. All I was trying to do was to simplify Wyoming's obvious dilemma. When you only tell felons they can't have "firearms", under the present definition, they get to have Kentucky longrifles and 45/70s.

72 posted on 06/29/2006 6:08:56 PM PDT by Migraine (...diversity is great (until it happens to you)...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson