This is what happens when you have an almost one party state and when you elect Republicans who are cowards and won't stand up for the people who elected them.
These judges are probably some of Bill Clinton's best 'friends'. They also didn't have a problem with him lying under oath apparently.
Relax... the court didn't establish any constitutional rights or anything like that. The rule was not a statute, but a policy of the Child Protection Board. The court found that the Board was not empowered with the ability to legislate such issues. Which is balderdash, because the Board is charged with finding a suitable home, so the court is legislating as to how to define a suitable home. Nonetheless, all that has to be done is that the legislature has to update the Child Protection Board's authorization to make such policy.