I always read Scalia to know what the Constitutuion actually says.
More Thomas hitting the libs upside the head.
"But this suggestion betrays the pluralitys unfamiliarity with the realities of warfare and its willful blindness to our precedents. The starting point of the present conflict (or indeed any conflict) is not determined by congressional enactment, but rather by the initiation of hostilities. See Prize Cases, supra, at 668 (recognizing that war may be initiated by invasion of a foreign nation, and that such initiation, and the Presidents response, usually precedes congressional action)."
Here he calls them stupid;
"And the pluralitys unsupportable contrary determination merely confirms that the Judiciary has neither aptitude, facilities nor responsibility for making military or foreignaffairs judgments. Hamdi, 542 U. S., at 585 (THOMAS, J., dissenting) (quoting Chicago & Southern Air Lines, 333 U. S., at 111)."
How many Justices heard this? Where is Roberts?