Skip to comments.
Bill targets smokers with children
Contra Costa Times ^
| 6/29/6
| Edwin Garcia
Posted on 06/29/2006 7:49:10 AM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-384 next last
1
posted on
06/29/2006 7:49:12 AM PDT
by
SmithL
To: Gabz; SheLion
2
posted on
06/29/2006 7:50:17 AM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4Irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
To: SmithL
Unbelievable. What is it going to take to wake voters up to what they are voting for?
3
posted on
06/29/2006 7:50:22 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
To: SmithL
We are gathered here today to mourn the death of personal responsibility. Once upon a time folks were responsible for their own actions... alas, the government now feels the need to take over that task. You will be missed personal responsibility... you will be missed.
To: Just A Nobody
????? ... it she comes = here it comes!
5
posted on
06/29/2006 7:51:18 AM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4Irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
To: SmithL
"This just demonstrates the state of government today -- and this is why I'm active in the Libertarian party, to try to fight this type of mommy and daddy government, or nanny government," said Lois Garcia of San Jose. "The Libertarian view is against any sort of government interference in a person's personal life and choice," she said, "including the way that they raise their children." Please.... Call it what it is Marxist, not cute "nanny"
6
posted on
06/29/2006 7:51:38 AM PDT
by
CygnusXI
(Where's that dang Meteor already?)
To: SmithL
Welcome to California THE NANNY STATE!
7
posted on
06/29/2006 7:52:26 AM PDT
by
RasterMaster
("Big Tents" you get Clowns & Circus Freaks! The road to HELL is paved with LIEberals!)
To: SmithL
Next up: The DEA considers new tobacco "laws", citing nicotine's stimulant effects. Raids soon to follow.
8
posted on
06/29/2006 7:53:24 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(It is by will alone I set my mind in motion...)
To: RasterMaster
They have found that they can dam near pass anything if it is under the mantra of......it's for the children!
9
posted on
06/29/2006 7:54:16 AM PDT
by
sheana
To: CygnusXI
Sorry I have to call BS on this. Parents do not have the right to treat their children how ever they want. They can't beat up their kids, starve them, or otherwise abuse their children. How is locking your child up in a smoke filled room or car any different than child abuse?
I'm against government regulation in many things, but too many stupid people having kids who shouldn't, doesn't give them a right to raise them in bad conditions.
To: SmithL
"There's no excuse in today's society for any mother of any age, or any level of education, to do something which I consider akin to child abuse," said Sen. Deborah Ortiz (the most pious and exalted one, keeper of the faith, and ruler of all which she surveys), D-Sacramento, chair of the Senate Health Committee, which approved the measure. A) How did we ever survive without such benevolent people like this looking out for us?
B) Here's to being liberated from CA for 5 years!
To: SmithL; Gabz
they want to ban smoking in a convertable, with the top down, if children are on board
NB: The original sponsor died of "Liver failure and influenza" at age 39.
12
posted on
06/29/2006 7:57:10 AM PDT
by
patton
(...in spit of it all...)
To: ritewingwarrior
You consider smoking in a car with your children child abuse, I dont.
That's all.
I got a question for you then.
Would people who are cited for moving violations (speeding, turning right on red when not allowed, etc..) also be guilty of child abuse?
Because, while there may be an increased risk of health effects for smoking near children, a moving violation in the wrong place at the wrong time may kill them instanty.
13
posted on
06/29/2006 7:59:37 AM PDT
by
CygnusXI
(Where's that dang Meteor already?)
To: SmithL
yup, and where will they go next? Inside the homes of smokers.. this is getting way out of hand.
14
posted on
06/29/2006 8:00:34 AM PDT
by
eXe
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: yayforlater
"We are gathered here today to mourn the death of personal responsibility. "
And, sadly, personal responsiblitiy's close relative, personal freedom is on life support.
15
posted on
06/29/2006 8:01:12 AM PDT
by
brownsfan
(It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
To: SmithL
Have they voted to ban abortion yet?
16
posted on
06/29/2006 8:03:27 AM PDT
by
CSM
("Most men's inappropriate thoughts end as soon as the girl talks..." - Dinsdale, 5/30/06)
To: Gabz; SheLion
17
posted on
06/29/2006 8:04:30 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: CygnusXI
"Because, while there may be an increased risk of health effects for smoking near children, a moving violation in the wrong place at the wrong time may kill them instanty."
The proverbial slippery slope. However, I think the people behind this are more than comfortable taking more and more control of our lives.
BTW, my parents smoked like chimineys, yes, while I was in the car with them. I'm 48, no ill effects. I know it's not scientific, or conclusive, but, it's also pertinent.
18
posted on
06/29/2006 8:04:44 AM PDT
by
brownsfan
(It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
To: SmithL
(The answer was no. In fact, studies show, secondhand smoke affects children in cars even if the windows are rolled down, Alicia Sanchez of the Children's Advocacy Institute, testified).She said this under oath?
"A recent study published by the Pediatrics journal confirmed that more children die of secondhand smoke exposure than all other accidental causes of injury and death combined," said Brendan Twohig of the American Heart Association.
Cite two death certificates, please.
19
posted on
06/29/2006 8:05:02 AM PDT
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: CygnusXI; brownsfan; eXe
Correct. I'm an ex-smoker, but for goodness' sake, where's the limit to gubmint intervention? Here comes the chip monitors...
20
posted on
06/29/2006 8:05:22 AM PDT
by
Froufrou
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-384 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson