Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncledave

Check the ruling again. If I'm reading this right, it doesn't say we can't HOLD them . . . only that we can't TRY them. Am I missing something?


27 posted on 06/29/2006 7:53:46 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LS

That was my take too although it doesn't make a lot of sense.


28 posted on 06/29/2006 7:55:17 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: LS

I agree.

All it says is that Bush can't set up tribunals and try them. Doesn't say anything has to be done with them.


38 posted on 06/29/2006 8:11:28 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: LS

The other point it makes is that the CONGRESS needs to set this up and decide...

Lindsay Graham said on FOX that he would introduce legislation asap ..

The ruling seems to suggest they can be held til the end of the WOT..


42 posted on 06/29/2006 8:15:48 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson