Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IMRight

I was answering to your statement that they're covered by the Geneva Convention.
Your post #32.
* * * * * *
And the "they" in that post did not refer to enemy combatants. It was the military tribunals.



Nice spin since you didn't make that clear until later in the thread.


816 posted on 06/29/2006 1:00:03 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (LIGHT A PRAYER CANDLE FOR THE TROOPS: http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/enter.cfm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801 | View Replies ]


To: AmeriBrit
Nice spin since you didn't make that clear until later in the thread.

No spin involved at all. You might try looking up the word "context" and applying it.

If you read the post that I replied to, no other reading is possible.

817 posted on 06/29/2006 1:02:32 PM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson