Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I don't know (it was 14, I misspoke). I don't know how many face charges there.

I know alot of freepers are saying this ruling means - "we can just hold them forever, since the war on terror will never end, they will be perpetual prisoners of war". I wouldn't hang my hat on that. now the the federal courts all the way to the top have inserted their jurisdiction into this, anything is possible.

congress could do alot of things, but I don't think they will. I don't think the senate will give the president the power to hold military tribunals for them, as the sole and final disposition of justice for them.

and the left isn't done. they wil now be going into federal court to try and deconstruct the CIA foreign prisons operations. watch.

the only sure way to stop it - one more SCOTUS retirement amongst the 5 dirtbags that issued this ruling.


810 posted on 06/29/2006 12:09:39 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 808 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview
How did FDR handle WWII?

Describe the Detainee Treatment Act.

831 posted on 06/29/2006 1:57:51 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview
and the left isn't done. they wil now be going into federal court to try and deconstruct the CIA foreign prisons operations. watch. What foreign prisons?
836 posted on 06/29/2006 2:10:15 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview

No. the only way to undo this is to eliminate the illegitimate doctrine of JUDICIAL REVIEW. We conservatives sometimes do not see the forest for the trees. Such is the case here. The forest--or elephant in the living room--that is being ignored is the entire concept of JUDICIAL REVIEW. The US Constitution does not authorize judicial review. Such an authority is nowhere to be found in its text. Marbury v. Madison (1803) is the first time judicial review was invoked by the SCOTUS, and it basically was a constitutional coup d etat by CJ John Marshall. Why Pres. Jefferson did not call Marshalls bluff I will never understand. The Framers would have detested judicial review. It takes power away from the general will of the American people (infallible) and gives it to nine all-to-fallible unelected oligarchs. Judicial review has caused injustice (Plessy, Korematsu, Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Kelo) and even war (Dred Scott). Judicial review is a concept which does our conservative movement no good. Our movement is about the PEOPLE and their sovereignty; judicial review only takes that away. There is a great article calling for the abolition of judicial review on townhall.com by a brilliant young political scientist named Ben Shapiro. To put it bluntly, instead of b*tching about this SCOTUS decision or that, or praying that the right justice gets on the bench, we conservatives should push to reverse Marshalls constitutional coup and abolish this odious doctrine once and for all. Let people elected by the people, who swear to uphold the Constitution, decide what is constitutional.


863 posted on 06/30/2006 3:32:33 AM PDT by tee-sixtytwo (Definition of a fiscal conservative--a social liberal who thinks his taxes are too high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson