Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamiefoxer
President of the United States does not have unlimited authority to suspend our rule of law and due process rights,

Suspend? Unlimited? Rule of law? Those things weren't even on the table.

Respectfully, do you have any idea what was being debated?

604 posted on 06/29/2006 9:18:44 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies ]


To: lepton
LOL, another good troll-bait thread!

I love when the libs defend head-choppers.
610 posted on 06/29/2006 9:19:56 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies ]

To: lepton

Yes,

The issue at stake is whether the President can indefinitely hold "enemy combatants" without due process, without Geneva Convention protections (IF THEY APPLY), and give them military commisions outside of SCOTUS jurisdiction as their only due process. SCOTUS disagreed with this today. Don't know where it will go, but my view is that we should...

Procedures to follow, in a nutshell.

If Al-Qaeda, try, prove, find guilty or innocent, and either IMPRISON (if guilty) or release (if innocent).
If legitimate POW, hold in appropriate facility humanely with oversight from Congress and SCOTUS, and release after end of our wars.

Simple LEGAL procedures we can follow that maintain our national security AND maintain our rule of law/values.


634 posted on 06/29/2006 9:26:29 AM PDT by jamiefoxer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson