Posted on 06/28/2006 12:52:02 PM PDT by calcowgirl
It's gonna be a crowded ballot!
It will be quite telling when we see who is on which side.
That's either the 12th or the 14th initiative on the ballot,, whew!
There are now 13 initiatives on the November ballot, with one more going through signature verification... so it could be 14... it would have been 15, but one was moved to the November 2008 election.
There are a couple good initiatives... and many that are wallet grabbers... I'm afraid that the good ones are going to go down in flames as many in the California electorate will get "NO Fever" and vote them all down.
Rank-and-file members of both parties oppose the government's seizure of homes and businesses for transfer to private parties. In April, conservative Republican state Sen. Tom McClintock and liberal Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters shared the stage at an event in Burbank to denounce these land grabs.I expect to hear a deadly silence from the elitist New-Majorityite, Main Street types. Protecting property rights cuts into their piggy bank.
Legislative Constitutional Amendment
SCA 7 (Resolution Chapter 49, 2006). Torlakson.
Transportation Investment Fund
Legislative Bond Act
SB 1266 (Chapter 25, 2006). Perata.
Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, Port Security Bond Act of 2006
Legislative Bond Act
SB 1689 (Chapter 27, 2006). Perata.
Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2006.
Legislative Bond Act
AB 127 (Chapter 35, 2006). Núñez.
Education facilities: Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2006.
Legislative Bond Act
AB 140 (Chapter 33, 2006). Núñez.
Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006.
Initiative Statute
1154. (SA2005RF0092)
Sex Offenders. Sexually Violent Predators. Punishment, Residence Restrictions and Monitoring. Initiative Statute.
Proponent: Richard Gann, George Runner and Sharon Runner, c/o Dave Gilliard (916) 444-1502
Increases penalties for violent and habitual sex offenders and child molesters. Prohibits registered sex offenders from residing within 2,000 feet of any school or park, and requires lifetime Global Positioning System monitoring of felony registered sex offenders. Expands the definition of a sexually violent predator, and changes the current two-year involuntary civil commitment for a sexually violent predator to an indeterminate commitment, subject to annual review by the Director of Mental Health and petition by the sexually violent predator for conditional release or unconditional discharge. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Unknown net costs to the state, within a few years, potentially in the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually due primarily to increased state prison, parole supervision, and mental health program costs. These costs would grow significantly in the long term. Potential one-time state capital outlay costs, within a few years, in the low hundreds of millions of dollars for construction of additional state mental hospital and prison beds. Unknown but potentially significant net operating costs or savings to counties for jail, probation supervision, district attorneys, and public defenders. The portion of costs related to changes in the Sexual Violent Predators program would be reimbursed by the state.
Initiative Statute
1185. (SA2005RF0131)
Water Quality, Safety and Supply. Flood Control. Natural Resource Protection. Park Improvements. Bonds. Initiative Statute.
Proponent: Stephen J. Kaufman (213) 452-6565
Authorizes $5,388,000,000 in general obligation bonds, payable from the states General Fund, to fund projects relating to safe drinking water, water quality and supply, flood control, waterway and natural resource protection, water pollution and contamination control, state and local park improvements, public access to natural resources, and conservation efforts. Provides funding for emergency drinking water, and exempts such expenditures from public contract and procurement requirements to ensure immediate action for public safety. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: State cost of about $10.5 billion over 30 years to pay off both the principal ($5.4 billion) and interest ($5.1 billion) costs on the bonds. Payments of about $350 million per year. Reduction in local property tax revenues of several million dollars annually, about one-half of which would be offset by state payments to schools to make up their revenue loss. Unknown costs, potentially tens of millions of dollars per year, to state and local governments to operate or maintain properties or projects acquired or developed with these bond funds. (SA2005RF0131.)
Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute
1197. (SA2005RF0139, Amdt. #1-NS)
Tax on Cigarettes. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.
Summary Date: 02/10/06 Circulation Deadline: 07/10/06 Signatures Required: 598,105Proponent: Paul Knepprath (916) 444-8801
Imposes additional 13 cent tax on each cigarette distributed ($2.60 per pack), and indirectly increases tax on other tobacco products. Provides funding to qualified hospitals for emergency services, nursing education and health insurance to eligible children. Revenue also allocated to specified purposes including tobacco use prevention programs, enforcement of tobacco-related laws, and research, prevention and treatment of various conditions including cancers (breast, cervical, prostate and colorectal), heart disease, stroke, asthma and obesity. Exempts recipient hospitals from antitrust laws in certain circumstances. Revenue excluded from appropriation limits and Proposition 98 calculations. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Increase in new state tobacco tax revenues of about $2.1 billion annually by 2007-08, declining slightly annually thereafter. Those revenues would be used for various health and tobacco-related programs and for childrens health coverage. Unknown net state costs potentially reaching the low hundreds of millions annually after a few years due to provisions for streamlining enrollment in the Medi-Cal and HFP. Unknown but potentially significant savings to counties on a statewide basis beginning in the near term for a shift of children from county health coverage to HFP, with unknown but potentially significant costs to the state in the long term for ongoing support of expanded HFP enrollment. Unknown but potentially significant savings in state and local government public health care costs over time due to expected reduction in consumption of tobacco products and due to other factors. (SA2005RF0139, Amdt. #1-NS.)
Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute
1196. (SA2005RF0138, Amdt. #2-S)
Alternative Energy. Research, Production, Incentives. Tax on California Oil. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute
Summary Date: 02/09/06 Circulation Deadline: 07/10/06 Signatures Required: 598,105Proponent: James C. Harrison and Thomas A. Willis c/o Remcho, Johansen & Purcell (510) 346-6200
Establishes $4 billion program to reduce oil and gasoline usage by 25%, with research and production incentives for alternative energy, alternative energy vehicles, energy efficient technologies, and for education and training. Funded by tax of 1.5% to 6%, depending on oil price per barrel, on producers of oil extracted in California. Prohibits producers from passing tax on to consumers. Program administered by California Energy Alternatives Program Authority. Prohibits changing tax while indebtedness remains. Revenues excluded from Proposition 98 calculations and appropriation limits. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: New state revenues annually depending on the interpretation of the measures tax rate provisions of either about $200 million or about $380 million from the imposition of a severance tax on oil production, to be used to fund a variety of new alternative energy programs. Reductions of unknown amounts in: local revenues from property taxes paid on oil reserves, potentially partially offset by state payments to schools to make up their revenue loss; state revenues from income taxes paid by oil producers; and, potentially, state and local revenues from gasoline and diesel excise and sales taxes. (SA2005RF138, Amdt. #2-S.)
Education Funding. Real Property Parcel Tax. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.Initiative Statute
Summary Date: 02/07/06 Circulation Deadline: 07/07/06 Signatures Required: 598,105Proponent: John D. Adkisson c/o Joan L. Cassman and Steven D. Miller (415) 777-3200
Provides additional public school funding for kindergarten through grade 12 by imposing a $50 tax on each real property parcel; exempts certain elderly and disabled homeowners. Funds must be used for class size reduction, textbooks, school safety, Academic Success facility grants, and a data system to evaluate educational program effectiveness. Provides for reimbursement to government entities to offset anticipated decrease in other tax revenue. Prohibits fund use for school administrative overhead. Requires school district audits and penalties for fund misuse. Excludes funds from Proposition 98 calculations. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Annual revenue of up to $500 million from a new, statewide parcel tax with the revenue dedicated to specific K-12 education programs (such as class size reduction, instructional materials, school safety, and facility grants). (SA2005RF0126.)
Political Campaigns. Public Financing. Corporate Tax Increase. Contribution and Expenditure Limits. Initiative Statute.
Summary Date: 04/03/06 Circulation Deadline: 08/31/06 Signatures Required: 373,816Proponent: Deborah Burger c/o Michael Lighty (510) 273-2200
Provides that candidates for state elective office meeting certain eligibility requirements, including collection of a specified number of $5.00 contributions from voters, may voluntarily receive public campaign funding from the Fair Political Practices Commission, in amounts varying by elective office and type of election. Increases income tax rate on corporations and financial institutions by 0.2 percent to fund program. Imposes new limits on campaign contributions to state-office candidates and campaign committees, and new restrictions on contributions and expenditures by lobbyists and corporations. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Increased revenues (primarily from increased taxes on corporations and financial institutions) totaling more than $200 million annually to pay for the public financing of political campaigns for state elected offices. (SA2006RF0015.)
Initiative Constitutional Amendment1204. (SA2005RF0146)
Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 02/16/06 Circulation Deadline: 07/17/06 Signatures Required: 598,105Proponent: Anita S. Anderson
Bars state and local governments from condemning or damaging private property to promote other private projects, uses. Limits governments authority to adopt certain land use, housing, consumer, environmental and workplace laws and regulations, except when necessary to preserve public health or safety. Voids unpublished eminent domain court decisions. Defines just compensation. Government must occupy condemned property or lease property for public use. Condemned private property must be offered for resale to prior owner or owners heir at current fair market value if government abandons condemnations objective. Exempts certain governmental actions. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Unknown, but potentially significant major future costs for state and local governments to pay damages and/or modify regulatory or other policies to conform to the measures provisions. Unknown, potentially major changes in governmental costs to acquire property for public purposes. (SA2005RF0146.)
Bond MeasureSB 1856 (Chapter 697, 2002). Costa.
Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century.*
Transportation Funding. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.
Summary Date: 01/03/06 Circulation Deadline: 06/02/06 Signatures Required: 598,105Proponent: James Earp, c/o Richard D. Martland (916) 446-6752
Prohibits retention of funds earmarked for the Transportation Investment Fund in the General Fund for use unrelated to transportation after 7/1/08. Requires repayment by 6/30/17 of transportation funds retained in the General Fund in years prior to 2007-08. Eliminates General Fund borrowing of specified transportation funds, except for cash-flow purposes (repayment required within 30 days of adoption of budget); current law allows borrowing for three years where Governor declares transfer would cause significant negative fiscal impact on governmental functions and Legislature enacts authorizing statute. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: No revenue or cost effects. Increases stability of funding to transportation in 2007-08 and thereafter; reduces somewhat the states flexibility to use specified transportation funds for other (nontransportation) activities. (SA2005RF0123)
Can "I voted at gitmo 'getNO'" caps and shirts be far behind? :-)
I hope you're right! How accurate is your crystal ball?
It's cracked, but once in a while it's on target.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/28/BAG0LJLKDS1.DTL
(snip)
The California measure would require governments to occupy seized property themselves or contract out for public use. It also could increase how much governments must pay for seized property.
Critics say the California initiative is grossly misleading because in addition to the eminent domain provisions it would gut government's ability to regulate land use and urban growth.
In particular, the measure contains controversial language that would require governments to compensate landowners if new regulations not directly related to public safety hurt a property's value -- unless the property is exempted from the new restrictions.
Cities, redevelopment agencies, urban planners and environmental, school and public safety groups say they will vigorously fight the measure.
This is California. So as soon as the voters pass something in the public good, the courts will rule it unconstitutional.
Ditto Calcowgirl!
Ditto Calcowgirl!
Oops, sorry for the double post!
No problem! Thanks for the extra bumps! :-)
I am sure the cities and counties in the state will directly or indirectly spend millions to defeat this bill. If the various governmental agencies cannot contribute directly, they will have unions, and other special interest groups do it for them. I hope it passes.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute
1186. (SA2005RF0132, Amdt. #1-S)Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor's Pregnancy. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 02/03/06 Circulation Deadline: 07/03/06 Signatures Required: 598,105
Proponent: Paul E. Laubacher, R.N. (916) 381-7094Amends California Constitution to prohibit abortion for unemancipated minor until 48 hours after physician notifies minor's parent or legal guardian, except in medical emergency or with parental waiver. Permits minor to obtain court order waiving notice based on clear and convincing evidence of minor's maturity or best interests. Mandates various reporting requirements, including reports from physicians regarding abortions performed on minors. Authorizes monetary damages against physicians for violation. Requires minor's consent to abortion, with certain exceptions. Permits judicial relief if minor's consent coerced. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Potential unknown net state costs of several million dollars annually for health and social services programs, court administration, and state health agency administration combined. (SA2005RF0132, Amdt. #1-S)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.