Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
Let's see it go to the SCOTUS. Be interesting to see what they say.

Thomas Jefferson to Abigail Smith Adams,

Monticello, Sep 11, '04.

"You seem to think it devolved on the judges to decide on the validity of the sedition law. But nothing in the Constitution has given them a right to decide for the Executive, more than to the Executive to decide for them. Both magistracies are equally independent in the sphere of action assigned to them. The judges, believing the law constitutional, had a right to pass a sentence of fine and imprisonment; because that power was placed in their hands by the Constitution. But the Executive, believing the law to be unconstitutional, was bound to remit the execution of it; because that power has been confided to him by the Constitution. That instrument meant that its co-ordinate branches should be cheeks on each other. But the opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional, and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but for the Legislature & Executive also, in their spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic branch."


Also, the President could get around any of this by just issuing a pardon to anyone convicted of a section of any law that he feels is unconstitutional.

57 posted on 06/28/2006 8:53:17 AM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: michigander
Interesting, but really of no consequence. Jefferson wasn't even a member of the Constitutional Convention. And of all the American founders, none was more flippant in writing that Jefferson. Even Madison sought to draw a distinction between his Virginia Resolutions and Jefferson's Kentucky resolutions. Jefferson was, to put it in modern terms, outside the mainstream, even in his day.

It really is THE question though. Who decides? We've had nullification problems before, because all possible means seem to invite chaos. Can the president nullify a law he thinks is unconstitutional? Then how about states? Jefferson felt they could as well. So how to operate as a Union if some states recognize a law other states nullify? Or if a president nullifies a law that all states recognize? etc. Seems to me America has settled on the SCOTUS being the final arbiter, Jefferson's admonition notwithstanding. Seems to me we fought a war over a lot of these issues as well.

71 posted on 06/28/2006 9:02:31 AM PDT by Huck (Hey look, I'm still here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson