Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith
I don't see how there could be an issue for the courts merely on the basis of the statement. That would be advisory, there has to be an injured party for a case.

I do recall on at least one occasion, where Bush referred to one of his statements as advisory.

As in, he actually used the word "advisory statement" to describe one signing statement he has signed.

105 posted on 06/28/2006 9:37:16 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: Sonny M
I meant a court couldn't hear a case merely on the signing statement as such a court ruling would be "advisory".

I thought your previous post could be misconstrued to mean that one could sue over the statement.

109 posted on 06/28/2006 9:45:53 AM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson