1 posted on
06/28/2006 8:26:49 AM PDT by
hipaatwo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: Mo1; Peach; Txsleuth
2 posted on
06/28/2006 8:27:22 AM PDT by
hipaatwo
To: hipaatwo
Hey Karl!! This is what you get when you back the wrong horse!
3 posted on
06/28/2006 8:29:09 AM PDT by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: hipaatwo
OMG this idiot is embassing....come on PA. voters, lets file for centure of spect-ail....he doesn't need to be there...lets get someone in there that can do the job....
4 posted on
06/28/2006 8:29:48 AM PDT by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
To: hipaatwo
5 posted on
06/28/2006 8:30:28 AM PDT by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: hipaatwo
This is interesting from a constitutional perspective.
To: hipaatwo
If Congress does not like how the President interprets a law...then perhaps they should make a new law that is more clear on the intent of Congress in passing the law in the first place
7 posted on
06/28/2006 8:30:57 AM PDT by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: hipaatwo
With "friends" like this, who needs enemies?
8 posted on
06/28/2006 8:31:03 AM PDT by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3rd Bn. 5th Marines, RVN 1969. - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!)
To: hipaatwo
But we can't say anything against RINOs! Because that would just be mean-spirited and not nice. /sarc.
To: hipaatwo
"The Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, Arlen Specter, said yesterday that he is ``seriously considering" filing legislation to give Congress legal standing to sue President Bush over his use of signing statements to reserve the right to bypass laws. "
# 1. How is Sphincter going to get such stupid bill past The House?
And # 2. When is Sphincter the jerk going to comdemn The Slimes for giving our vital national security secrets to Al Quaeda, let alone bring in legislation to give congress the power to sue The Slimes?
Sphincter is is just so pathetic.
12 posted on
06/28/2006 8:33:16 AM PDT by
Jameison
To: hipaatwo
Sphincter expects Bush to roll over and rubber stamp every possibly unconstitutional law he passes? Good for Bush. I thought the senator loved "checks and balances".
13 posted on
06/28/2006 8:34:09 AM PDT by
Ron in Acreage
(VOTE DEMOCRAT--TERRORISTS ARE COUNTING ON IT)
To: hipaatwo
Good. Give it a try, you POS Arlen.
14 posted on
06/28/2006 8:34:30 AM PDT by
pissant
To: hipaatwo
One of the biggest mistakes of the 2004 campaign. Specter should have been allowed to lose by the White House. He is the ultimate RINO.
17 posted on
06/28/2006 8:35:34 AM PDT by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: hipaatwo
Spector is a piece of S*&T.
19 posted on
06/28/2006 8:36:06 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: hipaatwo
"depriving Congress of any chance to override his judgment"
This is what is really irking Specter and the rest of those in congress that believes its power "trumps" the executive in almost every aspect, IMO. The Senate in particular seems to believe that they are the ultimate authority on any given subject and the junk legislation that encroaches upon both the Executive and Judicial branches seems to bear that out.
Specter seems to think the HE runs the country, IMO.
20 posted on
06/28/2006 8:36:39 AM PDT by
Pox
(If it's a Coward you are searching for, you need look no further than the Democrats.)
To: hipaatwo
The first thing the Republicans in the Senate is to remove Specter from the Judiciary Committee chairman post. This RINO is a real thorn in our side.
Then the Republicans in Pennsylvania should find another candidate and start the move to replace Specter the next election cycle. He is a RAT.
24 posted on
06/28/2006 8:38:29 AM PDT by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: hipaatwo
``Signing statements are an appropriate means by which the president fulfills his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed."
Specter is a Clymer, we all agree, but the passive-aggressive childishness of signing something, then saying you won't enforce it is exactly the opposite of 'faithful execution.'
Bush 'enforcement' of immigration laws shows where this leads.
25 posted on
06/28/2006 8:38:37 AM PDT by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com)
To: hipaatwo

Spectre: "I will bring down Bush AND the GOP with my latest "golden bullet" plan."
26 posted on
06/28/2006 8:38:49 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: hipaatwo
When is the cancer going to finish eating his brain?
28 posted on
06/28/2006 8:39:35 AM PDT by
D-Chivas
To: hipaatwo
Snarlin Arlen is one DISLOYAL, UNGRATEFUL POS!!
29 posted on
06/28/2006 8:39:37 AM PDT by
Suzy Quzy
("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
To: Admin Moderator; All
In discussing Angus MacSpecter, the NO PROFANITY rule is torture.
30 posted on
06/28/2006 8:39:55 AM PDT by
dighton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson