I have the same attitude about NPR. I listen to it because it's like signals intelligence. The folks they interview express unguarded liberal opinions and sometimes they reveal plans and intentions that they might reserve on TV or on a MSM news program. Most of the time, on TV, liberals just go down the talking points. On NPR, they depart from the script and openly tell what's in their conniving hearts.
Dan Rathers legacy?Courage, Dan. Courage!Theres only one thing hell be remembered for: listening to that nut foaming at the mouth and putting those fake National Guard documents on air, she said. Thats it! Hes a good example of someone whos a pompous blowhard without much intellectual firepower, who gets pushed into taking positions to suck up to power. I mean, if Dan Rather were in a world by himself, I dont think he could come up with an idea on his own. But it shows you the cultural influence of liberalism. Thats just what he goes along with. Im sure if he lived during the Crusades, hed be a leading crusader.
He did have a lot of power for a long time, right?
Yes, well, all three networks did, she said. Thats why liberals are going crazy now. Theyre becoming like the Sunni insurgency without the physical courage.