Posted on 06/28/2006 5:10:56 AM PDT by libstripper
June was a very good month for Ann Coulter. Was it a good one for her millions of enemies and the future of the world? Hard to say.
On June 6, the day her fifth book, Godless: The Church of Liberalism, arrived in bookstores, Ms. Coulter appeared on NBCs The Today Show. The conversation with Matt Lauer began as a civil debate, but a barely concealed gleam in Mr. Lauers eyes suggested the host had a poison arrow waiting in his quiver.
And then it flew: His last question concerned a section in her book about the four 9/11 widows who dubbed themselves the Jersey Girls, and who became national figures for demanding an investigation into how the Bush administration might have prevented 9/11 and who later campaigned for John Kerry. In her book, Ms. Coulter calls them the witches of East Brunswick, describing them as Democratic Party pawns sent out onto the political stage because of their victim status, as messengers whom were not allowed to reply to, let alone criticize.
Mr. Lauer read Ms. Coulters words: These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis. I have never seen people enjoying their husbands death so much.
(Excerpt) Read more at observer.com ...
Right, wrong term. I think Rush would agree with me that he often comes across as a pompous ass, I mean, thats his schtick, its great really :) Even so, the guy is usually right, same as Ann.
I haven't watched his show since he made the ignorant claim that the Assault Weapons Ban was about regulating machine guns. He might as well become a director of the Brady Campaign. Why would I believe anything else he says?
Youre right about the brains.
Ann Coulter is brilliant.
Got to love Her! Dont you all get it?
She is falling on the sword, or taking the bullet, however you want to put it.
She anticipates that in the up coming elections The Jersey girls and Cindy Sheehan will be in front of every camera and on every liberal news outlet trying to tear our President down.
That's because the nutritional value of liberal ideas is on a par with candy.
Yes, but at least candy is sweet and very enjoyable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.