Now if some Freeper could just use these two images, with the fraudulent one mirror-imaged, in an animated overlay, that would be fun to have. At least then most of the Indians would appear right-handed.
I just loved seeing Dan Rather's memo alternating with the easy-to-create copy. It helped illustrate that the fraud was not just similar to the re-creation, but virtually lacked any differences. Every detail lined up.
Churchill could try to claim that he was "inspired" by the original, but the alignment of virtually every detail will reveal that there was no artistic contribution from Churchill whatever. It is an outright fraud.
He claimed the original artist gave him permission to use his painting. A claim that cannot be substantiated because the original artist is dead, but his son claims he would never have given such permission.