[Perdogg]

I don't think it's a good idea. Too many unresolved issue. One thing is what defines a flag.

[MinorityRepublican]

Agreed.

[TexasTaysor]

defines a flag

Not..."A"....flag. It's THE U.S.A. stars and stripes. THE flag of OUR country.

[ArrogantBustard]

I agree ... flag burners suck, but banning it opens a huge can of worms. I'm willing to put up with a fair amount of bad behaviour in order to keep the Freedom of Speech unmolested.

[Cobra64]

I don't think it's a good idea. Too many unresolved issue. One thing is what defines a flag.

Well that should not be too difficult. The American flag is something that looks like this:

[DManA]

It's an amendment to give Congress more power. I'm against it.

[UCANSEE2]

"Too many unresolved issue. One thing is what defines a flag. "

Apparently, this man, and the PGR, know what a flag is.



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1654452/posts

[BJungNan]

I don't think it's a good idea. Too many unresolved issue. One thing is what defines a flag.

Don't complicate a simple issue. The official U.S. flag in any form that it has been configured since our Independce. The Stars and Stripes.

It should be protected. Other countries, including free democracies, do not put up with crap like this.

[BJungNan]

The proposed amendment, sponsored by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, read: "The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States."

[Polybius]

I don't think it's a good idea. Too many unresolved issue. One thing is what defines a flag.

Another thing is what defines "burning".