[Dimensio]

Really?

Yes, really.

Then, I suppose we will have to agree to disagree and accept it,

On what will we disagree? Your response very clearly implied that a series of rights are granted through exchange of money for posession of a US flag from a private business.

or you will have to ponder the true meaning of life gained from wisdom of common sense gained from your interpretation of my response to your question and why it is correct but you think its not correct but in reality its actually a figment of your imagination.

I believe that I have adequately explained how your response to my initial question very clearly gives the impression that I stated. I do not understand your continued denial of the very clear implications of your answer.

[tgambill]

"I do not understand your continued denial of the very clear implications of your answer"

Well, then my continued denial of my clear implications should then be clear as you have answered very clearly that my implications were clear. Now, if they were clear, normally this means that they are understood. My continued denial of my clear implications means that I stand by the old saying, "That's my story and I'm sticking to it", and my clear impications of my answer means that I understand my response well, which obviously draws us to the logical conclusion that you do not.....as this is non-secuiter response that you sent, but I do appreciate that you can clearly see that my answer had clear implications. So, this should be a clear response as well. ya tink.....

So, that you can sleep at night, if you still don't understand I suggest you write it about 100 times on the blackboard so that is sinks in.....