Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: L.N. Smithee
Actually, you are wrong. The case involved a stolen flag. It didn't belong to the protester. The USSC ruled in such a way that if CarolinaGuitarman stole your flag and burned it in a public protest, he could not be touched by the law.

Presumably that would prevent you from a monetary recovery in a civil action.

The only way you could get satisfaction when CG steals and burns your flag is by going over to his house and sneaking up behind him with a D-handle shovel for an appropriate "blow for freedom".

That's one of the defects in the USSC decision that has concerned many right-minded people on both sides of the flag burning issue. Sure, it misrepresented flag burning as permitted political protest, but the nature of the case said the protester could steal the flag and there's nothing you could do about it.

This may, in fact, have deterred many possible flag burners. They know that no one is going to wait for the cops ~ they'll just take it as "fighting words" and cap 'em.

131 posted on 06/27/2006 5:47:30 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

"It didn't belong to the protester. The USSC ruled in such a way that if CarolinaGuitarman stole your flag and burned it in a public protest, he could not be touched by the law."

Don't be a coward and post about me without pinging me.


135 posted on 06/27/2006 5:49:44 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson