Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Once again ~ the USSC made their decision in the face of the flag in question having been the property of the federal government (as a material item). It was stolen from a post office.

The USSC didn't particularly care who owned it ~ they wanted it burned.

100 posted on 06/27/2006 5:19:25 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
Once again ~ the USSC made their decision in the face of the flag in question having been the property of the federal government (as a material item). It was stolen from a post office.

Are you saying that the court ruled that stealing a US flag is legal? Please cite the section of the ruling that supports such a thing if this your claim.
104 posted on 06/27/2006 5:22:21 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah
"Once again ~ the USSC made their decision in the face of the flag in question having been the property of the federal government (as a material item). It was stolen from a post office.

The USSC didn't particularly care who owned it ~ they wanted it burned."

The person who stole it should be charged with theft and destruction of property, NOT under an invented, unconstitutional law called flag-burning.
105 posted on 06/27/2006 5:23:48 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson