Posted on 06/27/2006 3:23:35 PM PDT by Graybeard58
In 2001, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation launched an ambitious program to remake high school education, and help more kids go to college, in their home state of Washington.
After pouring $134 million into the effort, the foundation has achieved results but also learned hard lessons. Twelve test-bed high schools have redesigned themselves into "small learning communities." About 2,500 low-income students are in college on foundation-provided scholarships.
But as so many education reformers before them have found, efforts to remake the US education system generated a measure of controversy that the Gateses and their foundation weren't prepared for.
"We went into it a little bit naively," Melinda Gates told an interviewer on PBS this week.
But that learning process is part of what makes the Gates Foundation symbolic of what may be the dawn of a new, and extraordinarily dynamic, era in philanthropy.
Of course, it's also sheer scale. As of last month, this was already the world's biggest philanthropic foundation. As of this week, its giving in the fields of global healthcare and US education is poised to double, thanks to a move by billionaire Warren Buffett to donate much of his fortune to the foundation.
Yet what's most remarkable is not just how much the world's two richest men are giving to charity, it's how they hope to do it. To the degree that they can tap contemporary information technology, rigorous managerial techniques, and a determination to partner broadly with other institutions, they could push worldwide philanthropy in new directions - and have a major impact in their own right.
"They're doing something that will be marked ... as the beginning of the new golden age in philanthropy," predicts Paul Schervish, director of the Center on Wealth and Philanthropy at Boston College. "What is new is the way in which these foundations are themselves hands-on," not just funding others but implementing their own agendas on a global scale.
But Dr. Schervish expects that the publicity it has spawned will inspire innovative giving by other wealthy Americans. Some 7,000 households have wealth surpassing $100 million, he says, and about 500,000 have $10 million or more.
Such moves would tap into a long tradition of philanthropy in America.
In many ways, they are not that different from the model pioneered by Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller a century or more ago. Since 1913, for instance, the Rockefeller Foundation has pursued a Gates-like agenda including a global focus on public health.
Where the Rockefeller Foundation focused on vaccines for yellow fever, the Gates Foundation is supporting the quest for a malaria vaccine. America's 19th- century magnates didn't spawn foundations as large as the Gateses', even after adjusting for inflation. Yet their efforts have had a lasting impact, leaving behind such landmarks as Carnegie libraries in many American towns. The Ford Foundation, founded in the 1930s by Henry and Edsel Ford, still has billions in assets and spent $572 million on program activities in 2005.
With the infusion of cash from Mr. Buffett, the renowned investor who heads Berkshire Hathaway, the Gates Foundation expects to be spending more than $3 billion annually in the years ahead.
The estimated $30.7 billion gift by Buffett doubles the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's size to $60 billion, about five times the assets of the No. 2 Ford Foundation.
Buffett's gesture was an extraordinary departure from the tradition of the super-rich establishing foundations in their own names. He will also give sizable sums to foundations run by his children and one in his wife's name. But he said he trusts the Gates, longtime friends, to do more good with his money than he can do. His gifts will be spread out over many years, so the value of the gift in the end will depend on the path of Berkshire Hathaway stock.
Mr. Gates, for his part, recently announced his intention to focus more of his time on the foundation, while stepping aside from his role as chairman of Microsoft Corp. in 2008.
Whether the foundation will succeed in leveraging new tools and techniques in philanthropy remains to be seen.
Schervish is an optimist. He points to the quality of scientific endeavor and the speed of communication. Humanity's needs are more quickly known, as are the successes or failures of do-good efforts.
Meanwhile, he sees the Gates Foundation as part of a larger trend toward a more entrepreneurial style of philanthropy. Since the days of Rockefeller, philanthropy has sought to use research to get to the root of problems. But "venture philanthropy" involves partnering with government and other charitable groups. Money is contingent on hitting bench marks.
"I would say that the Gates Foundation and the Global Fund [to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria] are the two best examples of trying to be philanthropists for the 21st century," says Bernard Rivers of Aidspan in New York, which tracks the progress of the Global Fund. The Gates Foundation has joined with governments and other donors to support the Global Fund.
What these two groups have in common, he says, is the intense desire to not waste money and not to use partnership rather than paternalism.
Others are skeptical of the Gateses' track record.
"I would give Gates sort of a B+ so far," says Stanley Katz, a Princeton University historian who has studied giving in America. "On the education side ... they've spent huge amounts of money, in my judgment not very well."
Indeed, the very scale of the Gates Foundation exposes it to longstanding pitfalls. Bill Gates has said it's as hard to give money away effectively as it is to make money in the first place.
Moreover, some experts see risks in private foundations gaining too much influence through their money and partnerships. The reason: They are not accountable to voters or shareholders.
"We ought to be quite worried about that," Dr. Katz says.
"We ought to be quite worried about that," Dr. Katz says
Yes, by all means, let's worry about how somebody else gives their money away.
Only a socialist thinks this way.
Somehow these people never worry about the government having too much influence, what with the huge amount of money IT controls.
A B+? She's right if she means that Bill Gates is giving (B+)illions of his own money to charity. What is she doing, besides running her yap? It's none of her business what he does with his money.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gave $8.8 million to the Planned Parenthood Federation.
http://www.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/women/12/11/health.women.gates.reut/
"Microsoft offers source code to China"
http://itmatters.com.ph/news/news_03032003a.html
(removed from major news sites)
Gates: Buy stamps to send e-mail
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/03/05/spam.charge.ap/
Bill Gates against repealing the inheritance tax
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_inheritance.html
"Soros, one of the wealthiest men in the world, promised $15.5
million to defeating President Bush. Also on this list are
Bill Gates,..."
http://www.americasvoices.org/archives2003/CoxJ/CoxJ_112403.htm
The Left-Wing Billionaire Collectivist Pigs
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/9/25/191020.shtml
Billionaire Collectivist Pigs on a Roll
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/10/11/171315.shtml
"Gun-Control Group Changes Name, Keeps Agenda"
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=%5C%5CNation%5C%5Carchive%5C%5C200106%5C%5CNAT20010615a.html
(and Bill is a contributor)
"Is Bill Gates a closet liberal?"
http://archive.salon.com/21st/feature/1998/01/cov_29feature.html
(Bill Gates for gun control, pro-abortion, etc.)
http://vikingphoenix.com/news/madminute/1997/mm970040.htm
(Gates on gun control)
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/july-dec97/guns_11-4.html
(more money for gun control from Gates and his father)
"Bill Gates Is No Free Market Hero"
http://brian.carnell.com/articles/2000/12/000046.html
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/datelinedc/s_176864.html
Windows XP Shows the Direction Microsoft is Going
http://www.hevanet.com/peace/microsoft.htm
"the changing politics of Bill Gates" (national review, john j. miller)
http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m1282/2_51/53662235/p1/article.jhtml
2002 Feb 2, In NYC protesters of the World Economic Forum turned
out in large numbers. Inside foreign economic leaders criticized
the US for protectionist policies, and Bill Gates and U2 rock star
Bono pushed for increases in foreign aid by rich countries to poor
countries."
http://timelines.ws/days/02_02.HTML
"Software, soft money, and Libertarians"
http://www.seattleweekly.com/features/0039/news-anderson.shtml
[Bill gives money to both sides--whoever supports Microsoft and extreme social left policies. ...includes Barney Frank.]
Client testimonials, Bill Gates in China, Bill Clinton in China
http://www.beijinghighlights.com/testimonials/testimonials.htm
"State-owned Software Firm Ties up with Microsoft China"
http://fpeng.peopledaily.com.cn/200107/07/eng20010707_74398.html
It's still his money to give away as he pleases.
bttt
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gave $8.8 million to the Planned Parenthood Federation.
http://www.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/women/12/11/health.women.gates.reut/
Bill Gates against repealing the inheritance tax
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_inheritance.html
"Gun-Control Group Changes Name, Keeps Agenda"
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=%5C%5CNation%5C%5Carchive%5C%5C200106%5C%5CNAT20010615a.html
(and Bill is a contributor)
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/july-dec97/guns_11-4.html
(more money for gun control from Gates and his father)
"Is Bill Gates a closet liberal?"
http://archive.salon.com/21st/feature/1998/01/cov_29feature.html
(Bill Gates for gun control, pro-abortion, etc.)
http://vikingphoenix.com/news/madminute/1997/mm970040.htm
(Gates on gun control)
The Left-Wing Billionaire Collectivist Pigs
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/9/25/191020.shtml
Billionaire Collectivist Pigs on a Roll
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/10/11/171315.shtml
"Bill Gates Is No Free Market Hero"
http://brian.carnell.com/articles/2000/12/000046.html
I don't applaud his efforts, it's just that I have no input in the matter of how he spends his money, nor should I.
I can choose to buy or not buy his products and it's difficult not to own some of them.
On "his products," that's true.
Well, in this case I would worry if it's gained by actions taken on my part (e.g. buying MS products). Why? Isn't Gates curing the 3rd world of malaria? Treating HIV in Africa and doing good works?
Well, what is generally ignored by the mainstream press (and Gates) when shining up his philanthropic image is the Gates Foundation's multimillions in donations to both the UN Population Fund and Planned Parenthood International for providing abortions on demand to the 3rd world.
Doesn't mean he should be celebrated for it, does it?
And, of course, you should see what he's doing with the wealth you might've helped Gates acquire from consumers such as yourself.
I'm not "celebrating" him.
If you don't own any Gate's products, good for you.
But he wants you to. It's a careful campaign of deception. And the media, in love with his goals, is complicit. And there are conservatives who only see the wealth and assume any critics are jealous, or liberals wanting to control his money.
He should not be allowed to seek public accolades for his philanthropy based on a falsely created image. If he wants public adoration, he should be held up to scrutiny and be known for all his philanthropic activities, including the abortion mills. I don't see him doing this stuff anonymously, do you? Thus, public criticism is justified.
There are alternatives, you know: competitors, buying the products second-hand (thus you are not directly paying him), etc.
True enough, you end up supporting some "evil" regardless of what you buy be it slave-like labor. In this instance it is something you can try to minimize, if you're a strong prolife person. (If not, just say so.)
We should never let Gates get away with his 'only doing good works' scam. Spreading the truth is the least we can do for those whose lives will be ended "thanks" to his donations.
Oh, gag! Both these billionaires are carefully aranging not to have to pay a dime in inheritance tax. They just want YOU to pay an inheritance tax. (barf)
I have more than 11,000 replies at FR that are open to scrutiny, you can look up my position if you want to, I won't defend against implications.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.