Upholding the Second Amendment through the repeal of all gun control legislation that prevents law abiding citizens from the means of self-protection, as well as all restrictions on other personal weapons such as pepper spray, knives and swords, staves and clubs, etc. Laws that ban the private use and ownership of primarily offensive weapons such as bombs, deadly chemical weapons and military devices such as missile launchers and nuclear weapons. The revocation of arms rights from those who are convicted of commission or the involvement with the commission of violent crimes.
You've got some incomplete sentences in there, which I underlined. So as you can see, your position on those two particular clauses is not known--do you support them, or oppose them? Re-read the document, get some other people to do it (not just us, give it to friends in hardcopy, which is a lot easier to edit) and let them edit it for grammar and spelling.
I glanced at the foreign policy section, and it seems a little more realistic than current big-L Libertarian policy.
Good luck.
}:-)4
> You've got some incomplete sentences in there...
Not really. Those sentences are in the "we support:" section. Thus, the sentences describe the laws that they support.
Pity that section contradicts the Constitution. RKBA lacks limits (responsibility is presumed though).
The views are clear. If you read it in its entirety, it says: "Solutions: We Support: "...Laws that ban the private use and ownership of primarily offensive weapons...." Read each clause to begin with the phrase "We support," and it makes perfect sense and the sentences are not fragments. It might be easier to read if it were in bullet points, but this works fine.