Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cementjungle
I was just trying to say that one person can easily grow enough pot for the whole neighborhood

If they did so without paying taxes they'd be violating the tax laws. Why would they risk it, since the profits to be had would no longer be inflated by anti-pot laws?

The government's never going to starve for lack of alcohol taxes, but with pot I think if it became legal it would be much harder for the government to capture a large percentage of the market.

There might be somewhat more home growing than home brewing, but I know of no reason to predict a drastic difference.

In fact, I think if they were to legalize pot it may actually cut into sales of eithor booze and/or some prescription drugs.

Another argument in favor of legalizing pot; I'd rather deal with a stoner than a drunk any day of the week, and many law enforcement officers agree.

42 posted on 07/02/2006 3:19:51 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Know your rights
If they did so without paying taxes they'd be violating the tax laws. Why would they risk it, since the profits to be had would no longer be inflated by anti-pot laws?

People who make money babysitting, mowing lawns, housecleaning, etc. technically should be paying taxes too, but how many do you suppose actually are?

43 posted on 07/02/2006 3:27:39 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson