To: SirLinksalot
Interesting that all the reasons that have been given are negative. Let me give one that is positive:
Many people are being called to lead and cannot do so in their own church, so they begin a new one.
I see this all the time in my area and it is quite a positive thing.
And for those who think these house churches are just faith groups, many Christians attend two churches.
17 posted on
06/27/2006 10:23:44 AM PDT by
TexanToTheCore
(This space for hire...)
To: TexanToTheCore
Is it really helpful for those who don't feel they fit in to start their own church?
Of course it is the Protestant ideal: break away if the reform you think is needed does not happen exactly when and how you think it should.
But how does splintering off help the universal Church?
22 posted on
06/27/2006 10:28:19 AM PDT by
Notwithstanding
(I love my German shepherd - Benedict XVI reigns!)
To: TexanToTheCore
You bring up an interesting point. I had not thought of that angle and can easily see where this could be an issue. I will have to give this some thought.
To: TexanToTheCore
Many people are being called to lead and cannot do so in their own church, so they begin a new one.
Wouldn't that I-gotta-run-things impulse lead to fragmentation? I mean, you can't have all chiefs. You have to have some rank-and-file Indians.
One of the most important facets of leadership is that you must have followers, and if everyone is "called to lead," who will follow?
88 posted on
06/27/2006 1:09:47 PM PDT by
Xenalyte
(We all know power corrupts, yet we all want electricity.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson