"The victim says he chatted online with a woman, known on her MySpace.com profile as “Natalia”, for two weeks before deciding to meet with her. He says her profile showed sexy photos, and a blurb which said “just lookin’ for something fun”. That brief, friendly description was all he knew about her before they planned to meet.
These two statements are poorly written or they simply cannot logically be reconciled. Here is what it says:
1. He chatted with her for two weeks BEFORE deciding to meet with her.
2. After chatting for two weeks, and before they planned to meet, that brief friendly description was all her knew about her.
He's trying to have it two ways. He chatted with her for two weeks, therefore he had some knowledge of her. On the other hand, all he knew about her was from some photos and come comments.
Good points, the article is sorta sketchy in details on the chat. Also, we don't know even if he was chatting to one of the girls, both the girls, or the boy the article mentions (or all three were in it together). One thing is for certain, it doesn't take much cunning to fool certain people.
Do you remember that person we had on FR for a very long time called "SnowBunny"... Deception can occur even on FR and can weave a whole lot of tangled webs. It had me fooled I must admit and I am no spring chicken (later fall chicken I am). LOL..
Good chatting Enterprise..
LowOiL