Are not the LA and NY Times publicly traded stocks? Are there not laws which make it illegal for a company to actively work against the best interests of its stock holders? Has not the personal bias of those high up in both organizations driven down the value of the stocks and thus work at odds against those who finance the organizations? I say stock holders should sue to recoup their losses caused by those who hold their personal biases in higher regard than the welfare of the stock holders.
I heard somewhere that the 'family' is the major stock-holder in the NYCrimes...
I would assume that alerting their major advertisers of our deepening displeasure would be a better solution...
but there are soooooo many of those advertisers..
what do you say, KB?