To: DungeonMaster
I just point out it's limitations.
What are it is limitations, exactly?
Science measures light from galaxies and concludes that that light has been traveling billions of years for it to reach us. I don't have a problem with the fact that science is wrong because it has to be. It has no other recourse.
Why is science wrong with these conclusions? Please be specific.
609 posted on
06/29/2006 7:57:23 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
Why is science wrong with these conclusions? Please be specific. For the same reason science is wrong when it says a man can't walk on water. Light can't go faster than C, a man can't walk on water. Or we could throw in that non scientific stipulation "apart from some supernatural force" which has been tossed around on this thread. I just never saw that in any of my physics books.
611 posted on
06/29/2006 8:04:24 AM PDT by
DungeonMaster
(More and more churches are nada scriptura.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson