Replies

Show me the flower that produces moss or better yet an amoeba, then I'll believe that evolution is possible.

Um, does it suffice to say that a "flower producing an amoeba" is not a prediction made by the theory of evolution?

I'm not sure what kind of scientist you are, but your education is obviously seriously lacking in the area of evolutionary biology. You might want to get caught up on some of what's been learned by hard working scientists over the last century and a half before making ridiculous comments like this one.

you people are amazing ....

I show a absolute absurd comparison and "I'm" the one who needs an education. Any reasonable scientist knows you can not produce an amoeba by combining two flowers .... but maybe you do .... oh I'm sorry .... you really do believe that. Forgive me, I didn't mean to tax your intelligence quota.

I NEVER CLAIMED TO BE A EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGIST. READ MY POST. ON THE CONTRAY, I WAS VERY SPECIFIC IN POINTING OUT THAT I WASN'T. READ!!!!

But then, that would be to easy wouldn't it have. It's much easier to imply someone is beneath you because he doesn't agree with you right.

Thank you for proving once again that Evolutionist are nothing but close minded bigots who think they are better than everyone else because they can't understand the complexities of the theory of Evolution.

At least I as a "REAL" scientist, seeing no supporting proof of evolution, only has to accept one thing on faith, that of a supreme being who created everything. Why is the evolutionist argument always .... You can't be a real scientist if you don't believe in evolution? Question to the superior intellect .... Is there only one type of scientist? Obviously by your post you believe so. Answer ..... DUH No!

You on the other hand have to have faith in billions and billions of random totally independent actions in nature to justify your life (and yes faith is the right word despite your feeble attempt at changing it's definition)