Wow. She's even stupider than I'd thought (and that's saying something).
The museums are full of fossils of extinct species.
At the same time, less advanced species appear to have few ancestral species that are extinct.
The implication is clear ~ the best adapted species are not necessarily the most advanced, nor are the most advanced species the best adapted.
This, of course, is contrary to your Libertarian/Libertine ideology.
The question: if an observation in nature concerning the relative utility of evolution is not consistent with the social darwinist views of the Libertarian/Libertine class, is it true or false?