To: Virginia-American
Sorry, not my argument, and I'll just have to admit to not understanding the premise of the "theory of macroevolution". Is that an ID premise, or a Darwinian premise? Never mind, I guess I can read the posts myself. My only real assertions on this subject are that I don't think competitive advantage is a logical explanation for certain evolutionary traits, and that Darwinists are prone to asserting too much and getting far too emotional. I'd say the same thing about ID'ers, but I never get flamed by them.
To: SampleMan
...My only real assertions on this subject are that I don't think competitive advantage is a logical explanation for certain evolutionary traits, ... Fine. Show some theoretical and/or experimental results to back this assertion up, run it through the gauntlet of review and replication by skeptical experts, and maybe someday there will be something to teach in high school.
But as long as 99.7% (estimated) of biologists agree that standard ToE is fundamental to an understanding of life, that's what gets taught as science.
To: SampleMan
the "theory of macroevolution"
Never heard of it. Could you please summarize what it says?
99 posted on
06/27/2006 4:58:27 PM PDT by
ml1954
(NOT the BANNED disruptive troll who was seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson