[CarolinaGuitarman]

"So you didn't read the post I linked to you."

Yes I did. It didn't make your case.

"Interestingly, when I posted roughly the equivalent to what you say above, I got not one single nasty hysterical response from any IDers."

If you said what I said about ID, or anything close to it, you wouldn't be comparing the death of this bill with burning heretics at the stake.

[SampleMan]

From my earlier post on THIS thread:
I think religion should be taught in religious classes and that science should be clear when it is projecting theories beyond what is actually known (but I'm fine with them being taught). From archaeologists that create entire civilizations from shards of pottery, to Darwinists that insist all change can only be the result of survival of the fittest, (and yes religious people too) I think too much certainty about the uncertain is arrogant and begets conflict.

If you said what I said about ID, or anything close to it, you wouldn't be comparing the death of this bill with burning heretics at the stake.

You mean if I had deep personal disdain for them, and took every opportunity to be as nasty as possible to them by calling them idiots, etc.?

FYI, as mentioned several times previously, my post was in response to the attitude of someone like you, not to the bill not being passed.

You are the equivalent of the loud obnoxious drunk at the end of the bar, that you don't want on your side in a discussion. Maybe you're at the wrong end of the bar to understand this analogy.