"Of course not. That would require a strict adherence to the facts, instead of projecting what you want to believe. That pretty much says it all, and sums up my point nicely."
No, it would be because I DO adhere to the evidence, and your posting history does not support you claim.
"You know it is only a matter of time until these ID deviants begin an underground resistance of forbidden teaching in the public sector."
Cry me a river.
Really? All my posts (3000+)are available to you. Which one are you basing this on? Or is it just true because you're unwilling to accept that other possibilities might exist?
What would the world do without objective folk like you to tell them what they must think?
Cry me a river.
Crying? I was sympathizing with your plight. Its not easy keeping an iron grip on a doctrine of infallibility. You try to keep it pure, but before you know it, someone is off thinking on their own and even trying to convince other people. Such things just can't be tolerated. Perhaps a system of scientific excommunication could be used? Wait! Now that I think of it, its already being practiced by the Global Warming folks. There's nothing like using a working model.